Originally posted by FredBasset
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Court of Appeal and beyond
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
E-Mail from Treasury Committee
"Thank you for writing to the Treasury Committee. As you may have seen, Andrew Tyrie MP, Chairman of the Treasury Committee, made the following comments regarding retrospective taxation:
"Can retrospection be reconciled with the certainty a tax system needs in order to deliver an efficient economy? A simpler, more stable and fairer tax system is less likely to excite demands for retrospection.
"Any action the Government takes on this is likely to be something the Committee would want to look at as part of our study into the Budget."
The Chairman's comments were prompted by the actions HMRC took with regard to Barclays. This follows on from work the Committee previously undertook on the principles of tax policy.
I am sorry to hear about the distress caused to you by the changes introduced by Section 58 of the Finance Act 2008. I will ensure your concerns are drawn to the attention of the Members of the Committee. The Committee has not announced a specific inquiry into retrospective taxation but may look at this subject as part of its forthcoming work on the 2012 Budget. Your email will be useful background material to any work the Committee undertakes in this area.
Thank you for taking the trouble to write to the Committee."Comment
-
Treasury Committee Reply
Originally posted by FredBasset View PostHas anyone else had an e-mail back in response to their e-mail sent to the Treasury Select committee this morning?
Regards
FredComment
-
I've no thoughts as to whether its useful or not at this stage but at least its a response. I can pay but pointed out that retrospective interest can never be considered fair.
Regards
FredComment
-
Comment
-
Putting my faith in those who know when things are wrong!
I wrote an email to the treasury committee last week and just received a response!
"Dear Mr XXXXXX
Thank you for writing to the Treasury Committee. As you may have seen, Andrew Tyrie MP, Chairman of the Treasury Committee, made the following comments regarding retrospective taxation:
“Can retrospection be reconciled with the certainty a tax system needs in order to deliver an efficient economy? A simpler, more stable and fairer tax system is less likely to excite demands for retrospection.
"Any action the Government takes on this is likely to be something the Committee would want to look at as part of our study into the Budget.”
The Chairman’s comments were prompted by the actions HMRC took with regard to Barclays. This follows on from work the Committee previously undertook on the principles of tax policy.
I am sorry to hear about the distress caused to you by the changes introduced by Section 58 of the Finance Act 2008. I will ensure your concerns are drawn to the attention of the Members of the Committee. The Committee has not announced a specific inquiry into retrospective taxation but may look at this subject as part of its forthcoming work on the 2012 Budget. Your email will be useful background material to any work the Committee undertakes in this area.
Thank you for taking the trouble to write to the Committee.
Yours sincerely
Phil Jones
Committee Assistant
Treasury Committee"Comment
-
Originally posted by FredBasset View PostI've no thoughts as to whether its useful or not at this stage but at least its a response. I can pay but pointed out that retrospective interest can never be considered fair.
Regards
FredComment
-
Originally posted by FredBasset View PostHas anyone else had an e-mail back in response to their e-mail sent to the Treasury Select committee this morning?
Regards
FredComment
-
Originally posted by VictorValiant View Post"Thank you for writing to the Treasury Committee. As you may have seen, Andrew Tyrie MP, Chairman of the Treasury Committee, made the following comments regarding retrospective taxation:
"Can retrospection be reconciled with the certainty a tax system needs in order to deliver an efficient economy? A simpler, more stable and fairer tax system is less likely to excite demands for retrospection.
"Any action the Government takes on this is likely to be something the Committee would want to look at as part of our study into the Budget."
The Chairman's comments were prompted by the actions HMRC took with regard to Barclays. This follows on from work the Committee previously undertook on the principles of tax policy.
I am sorry to hear about the distress caused to you by the changes introduced by Section 58 of the Finance Act 2008. I will ensure your concerns are drawn to the attention of the Members of the Committee. The Committee has not announced a specific inquiry into retrospective taxation but may look at this subject as part of its forthcoming work on the 2012 Budget. Your email will be useful background material to any work the Committee undertakes in this area.
Thank you for taking the trouble to write to the Committee."Comment
-
Just received my reply from Treasury Committee
same - copy and paste job....
Its something I guessComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Yesterday 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment