Originally posted by MarillionFan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
HELP!, agent threatening to take legal action over notice period.
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post[I]Even though your husband did not sign a contract he would still be in breach and the agency would have grounds to take legal action; they offered a position to your husband which he accepted and now he has reneged on the deal; it would be like you hiring a kitchen fitter and him leaving it half finished because a better paying job came along[/I]Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI would say that was deliberately messing them about. Let me see what is worse, bad agency or bad contractor giving us all a bad name?Comment
-
Originally posted by ChristinaO View PostIt wasn't deliberately messing them about. The client was incredibly happy with his work and quite understood the circumstance. It's not for our own gain, you do realise there is a very tough market out there. In any case, with both jobs he was approached by agents and he did say at the beginning of the bad contract that this was more than 100% less that he was used to getting paid and he wouldn't want to stay long. The agency kept pushing and frankly, if you are going to lose your house, I trust you would do the same. He has given 2 weeks notice which is reasonable, please do not forget we are not permenant employees and therefore, a 28 day notice period is ridiculous. If the client is happy to let him go then why can't the agent. It's simply opportunistic.
Oh and the agency is horrific for other reasons, i.e. never paying him, not managing the contract properly. Thinking that this crap contract is a piece of gold... messing them about and frankly, the agent mus be about 19 and is new to the game.
Personally, Id have given 28 days, worked 14 then phoned in sick. LOL. Less hassle.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostI can see your point but if he started work on the contract (i.e. accepted it by default) then the notice period is 28 days. Are you saying now the agency should accept 14 days and suck it up? I can see why they aint happy.
Personally, Id have given 28 days, worked 14 then phoned in sick. LOL. Less hassle."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Not saying that I dont disagree with some of the things this young lady has said but, honestly, say you were on the bench for a while and a low paying contract came up.
Would you really not take it just in case a better one came up?
Or would you take and see if there was any scope for notice period if something better came up?
hmmmmm....Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostI can see your point but if he started work on the contract (i.e. accepted it by default) then the notice period is 28 days. Are you saying now the agency should accept 14 days and suck it up? I can see why they aint happy.
Personally, Id have given 28 days, worked 14 then phoned in sick. LOL. Less hassle.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
While I'm with northernladuk when it comes to honouring contracts, can we please not let this thread be derailed into an ethical discussion, nor a . The points have been well made I feel.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostWhile I'm with northernladuk when it comes to honouring contracts, can we please not let this thread be derailed into an ethical discussion, nor a . The points have been well made I feel.
Ethics and contractors don't go together. Please keep them separate.What happens in General, stays in General.You know what they say about assumptions!Comment
-
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostWhile I'm with northernladuk when it comes to honouring contracts, can we please not let this thread be derailed into an ethical discussion, nor a . The points have been well made I feel.
In all honesty, we never cared about the money, had it not been for the fact that the agent was threatening to sue for longer than the notice period. I'll quite happily pay them for their losses of 2 weeks but the full term of the contract? what would be the point in a notice period?
Thank you to the gentlemen to defended me (bench comment )
I probably won't need any more feedback. Thanks again!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Today 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Yesterday 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Comment