Originally posted by nfoote
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Pre-pay Dividends to avoid next year's tax?
Collapse
X
-
Probably. Haven't used FreeAgent so can't comment on what they provide. You should have a dividend voucher and minutes of meeting declaring the dividend. -
I don't think you can do this as dividends can only be paid out of profits and this is not profit. So taking the company's tax money out would have to be treated as a director's loan.Originally posted by nfoote View PostI have already paid out in dividends all of the retained profits for my company from the 10/11 tax year. The bank account now only contains Company Tax owed, NI(Employer/Employee) owed and PAYE owed. If I paid a further £2902.40 in dividends this would essentially be using the Company Tax "pot" which is simply sitting there until Jan 2012.
Anyone know for sure?Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Just1morethen's comment on this is correct (and it should be, he is an accountant).Originally posted by Wanderer View PostI don't think you can do this as dividends can only be paid out of profits and this is not profit. So taking the company's tax money out would have to be treated as a director's loan.
Anyone know for sure?
If the OP has issued another invoice before 5th April, then that (less the tax of course) counts as profit and can justify a dividend, even if that invoice is not paid before 5th April.
If the OP has not issued another invoice then any payment could not be treated as a dividend. It might still be possible to do something, maybe not, but these scenarios show why a decent accountant is a must-have.Comment
-
Agreed - my SJD spreadsheet shows 'Dividends available' from what I've invoiced, not from what's been paid.Originally posted by Gonzo View PostJust1morethen's comment on this is correct (and it should be, he is an accountant).
If the OP has issued another invoice before 5th April, then that (less the tax of course) counts as profit and can justify a dividend, even if that invoice is not paid before 5th April.
If the OP has not issued another invoice then any payment could not be treated as a dividend. It might still be possible to do something, maybe not, but these scenarios show why a decent accountant is a must-have.Comment
-
Thank you for posting this, you just saved me from a few hundred pounds of extra tax! I was forgetting to divide the Net Dividend by 0.9 in my calculations to get the Gross.Originally posted by Craig@InTouch View PostThe higher rate threshold in 10/11 is gross income totalling £43,875 (Personal allowance £6475 + Basic Rate Band £37,400). Assuming your personal income is simply salary and dividends, to work out what "gap" you have left before breaching the HR limit is working out what your gross income is first. This is gross salary + gross dividends.
The dividends you declare and pay from your company to yourself is a net dividend. To work out the gross, you simply divide the net by 0.9
When working out whether you hit the higher rate threshold, you can use the calculation:
Gross income from employment in the tax year X (J)
Gross income from dividend (net dividend / 0.9) X (K)
Other income e.g. rental profit, gross bank interest X (L)
Total gross income X (M) = (J) + (K) + (L)
Less Higher Rate Threshold (10/11) 43,875 (N)
Gross before HR tax X (O) = (N) – (M)
Bit depressing looking at what this does to available dividends for 2011-12 with the reduced allowances before the higher rate kicks in. Oh well, suppose it means more in the war chest for between contracts.
Just out of interest, does anyone here suffer the extra tax and actually pay themselves an income that substantially crosses over to the upper rate?Comment
-
Some people have personal circumstances which means that higher rate tax is unavoidable. If for example you have a lifestyle that requires £80k of income but you are single and can't therefore pay a dividend to a spouse then higher rate tax is inevitable. So yes, I'd imagine there will be a few on here that do so.Originally posted by landl View PostJust out of interest, does anyone here suffer the extra tax and actually pay themselves an income that substantially crosses over to the upper rate?Comment
-
AIUI, if you pay yourself just upto the reduced 11/12 40% threshold in salary and divi's then the increase in personal allowance combined with the reduction on 40% threshold should leave you with the same after tax income in 11/12 as you had in 10/11. Anyone care to confirm or otherwise on that?Originally posted by landl View PostThank you for posting this, you just saved me from a few hundred pounds of extra tax! I was forgetting to divide the Net Dividend by 0.9 in my calculations to get the Gross.
Bit depressing looking at what this does to available dividends for 2011-12 with the reduced allowances before the higher rate kicks in. Oh well, suppose it means more in the war chest for between contracts.
Just out of interest, does anyone here suffer the extra tax and actually pay themselves an income that substantially crosses over to the upper rate?Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.Comment
-
@FredBloggs
There's a difference:
2010-11
Salary (£110 X 52) = £5720.00
GROSS Dividend = (£43,875 - £5720) = £38155
NET Dividend = £38155 X 0.9 = £34339
Total NET income = £40059
2011-12
Salary (£139 X 52) = £7228
GROSS Dividend = (£42,475 - £7228) = £35247
NET Dividend = £35247 X 0.9 = £31722
Total NET income = £38950
Salary figures are based PEL for NIC.Comment
-
Yes of course you're right.Originally posted by Just1morethen View PostSome people have personal circumstances which means that higher rate tax is unavoidable. If for example you have a lifestyle that requires £80k of income but you are single and can't therefore pay a dividend to a spouse then higher rate tax is inevitable. So yes, I'd imagine there will be a few on here that do so.
I suppose every person has to weigh up whether their spending brings them an improvement in lifestyle that justifies the tax man's share, or whether they'd prefer to use that money as a buffer or an income for quality time between contracts. I've only been contracting for a few years now, so not yet at the point where the war chest is so large that I can hear it screaming "spend me, spend me".
Hopefully that time will come...Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment