I've had my contract review by a legal expert and they say it fails the IR35 test owing to 1 small clause. The contract mentions a trial period. This, apparently, is problematic. If it were reworded to initial period it would pass. Unfortunately this is a clause worded by the client and they're not prepared to change it (big company hence box ticking culture). Given that the rest of the contract is ok I'm tempted to stay out of ir35 and hope I can defend myself in event of investigation. Any thoughts?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Problem Clause in Contract
Collapse
X
-
-
Is the contract between your company and an agency or direct with the end client?
In my opinion, it can't simply fail on the small clause that says "trial period". The three basic areas when looking at IR35 is control, requirement for personal service (substitution etc) and MOO. -
With an agency. But the problem clause is worded by the end client.Originally posted by Craig@InTouch View PostIs the contract between your company and an agency or direct with the end client?
In my opinion, it can't simply fail on the small clause that says "trial period". The three basic areas when looking at IR35 is control, requirement for personal service (substitution etc) and MOO.Comment
-
Your IR35 status would be assessed on your actual working relationship with your end client and what happens on a day to day basis on site under the 3 main areas I mentioned previously.
If it helps, I would recommend seeking a second opinion and then you can compare the review.Comment
-
Know anyone who can provide the service? First opinion came from QDOS.Originally posted by Craig@InTouch View PostYour IR35 status would be assessed on your actual working relationship with your end client and what happens on a day to day basis on site under the 3 main areas I mentioned previously.
If it helps, I would recommend seeking a second opinion and then you can compare the review.Comment
-
I think QDOS provide their opinion purely on the basis that the contract reflects the actually working practices (but I could be wrong).
Many specialist contractor accountants can provide you an IR35 review
Comment
-
How much do you charge?Originally posted by Craig@InTouch View PostI think QDOS provide their opinion purely on the basis that the contract reflects the actually working practices (but I could be wrong).
Many specialist contractor accountants can provide you an IR35 review
Comment
-
Comment
-
But hopefully worth rather a lot more than that!Originally posted by Craig@InTouch View PostIts free of charge

InTouch know what they're doing and can be trusted, but there's a list of PCG Accredited Accountants on their website who have had the necessary training to make such assessments. Although a trial period is not actually an IR35 pointer either way, IMVHO, merely due diligence by the end client.Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
I've used these people before, they're excellent, and leaders in the field
Bauer & Cottrell - Expert IR35, Section 660 and Employment Status AdviceComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Today 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Yesterday 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57

Comment