• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IR35 - HMRC's View

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
    It's "fair" because we live in a socialist state. "Fairness" only means what the socialists want it to mean.
    You may have a point there Fred
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
      Why would that stop you answering it????
      Because he is just trolling and trying to get a reaction.
      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
        Because he is just trolling and trying to get a reaction.
        He's quite good at it
        Connect with me on LinkedIn

        Follow us on Twitter.

        ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
          You may have a point there Fred
          Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
          Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
            Give me an example of 'through no fault of their own'
            For example when someone is disabled; or a parent, child, or spouse is disabled.
            Step outside posh boy

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
              For example when someone is disabled; or a parent, child, or spouse is disabled.
              The welfare state was originally introduced to aid people who were unable to help themselves and I doubt that anyone would disagree that was a good thing. I am quite happy for everyone to pay 20% tax to ensure the that the welfare state continues to help people who are unable to help themselves. I am also certain that 20% tax across the board would be more than sufficient to fund it. The additional 'fair' taxes from the 'fat cats' are more likely to be used to fund those who will not work rather than those who cannot.
              Connect with me on LinkedIn

              Follow us on Twitter.

              ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
                The welfare state was originally introduced to aid people who were unable to help themselves and I doubt that anyone would disagree that was a good thing. I am quite happy for everyone to pay 20% tax to ensure the that the welfare state continues to help people who are unable to help themselves. I am also certain that 20% tax across the board would be more than sufficient to fund it. The additional 'fair' taxes from the 'fat cats' are more likely to be used to fund those who will not work rather than those who cannot.
                What about those who can not work, not because they are disabled, but because there are millions more people than there are jobs?
                Step outside posh boy

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
                  What about those who can not work, not because they are disabled, but because there are millions more people than there are jobs?
                  People do not have to rely on jobs being 'provided' when they could be created - hence why entrepreneurilism is essential to any econonomy
                  Connect with me on LinkedIn

                  Follow us on Twitter.

                  ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
                    People do not have to rely on jobs being 'provided' when they could be created - hence why entrepreneurilism is essential to any econonomy
                    So anybody who is unemployed should be blamed for it themselves, it's their fault for not creating a job?

                    What if the same applies to enrepreneurial activity as applies to employment: there just is not and cannot be enough of it to go round?
                    Step outside posh boy

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Tarquin Farquhar View Post
                      So anybody who is unemployed should be blamed for it themselves, it's their fault for not creating a job?

                      What if the same applies to enrepreneurial activity as applies to employment: there just is not and cannot be enough of it to go round?
                      Who said that people should be 'blamed' for being unemployed? I merely said there is an alternative to standard employment for anyone who is desperate enough to work.
                      Connect with me on LinkedIn

                      Follow us on Twitter.

                      ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X