Originally posted by Morlock
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostI do also think its a bit unrealistic at the present time, to expect the chancellor who to be fair, does have his hands very full to get involved in replying to these letters. Its a protocol issue and Im sure our individual MP's will be raising this with the relevant ministers
But HMRC???
These are the feckers we were complaining about.Comment
-
Have just re-tweaked my follow-up letter to Redwood asking him to ensure that this is NOT passed to HMRC as they are the co-conspirators in all this bulltulip...
DR.. if this is a sign of things to come, a new angle of attack may be required.Comment
-
Originally posted by RingStinger View PostDR.. if this is a sign of things to come, a new angle of attack may be required.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostI wouldn't have had a problem with it if the reply had come from the Treasury.
But HMRC???
These are the feckers we were complaining about.
I sort of hope that was HMRC as they were under Labour....Im trying to believe that HMRC are now the brave new world Tory organisation..Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostI sort of hope that was HMRC as they were under Labour....Im trying to believe that HMRC are now the brave new world Tory organisation..Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View PostIm trying to believe that HMRC are now the brave new world Tory organisation..
You have to remember that the HMRC Public 'Servants' haven't changed and they will still be operating with the same anonymous, vindictive and vicious characteristics they developed (enhanced?) under the tutelage of Brown/Balls (Brown Balls - ).
Check out The Silent State by Heather Brooke for a detailed explanation of how all these Public Services operate and how they manage to avoid all responsibility for their actions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnYourBikeGB View PostUnbelievable, it's a politician's move, alright. This way they get to make their cuts and not risk any backlash. Bad as it looks on the surface, we are all agreed that the legal route is going to take years. HMRC are not enforcing collection, and this is unlikely to change as the current Government knows that this would only make the Government look hypocritical. If this does have to run it's course, then the Government does have time to quietly drop this at a later date when it's less contentious, if there is (and it's a big 'if') a recovery and assuming it goes that far. At the moment, I suspect that it would just leave them open to attack. They have indicated their belief that what has happened is wrong, what they are hoping for may be that the courts will do their job for them. If HMRC get a good thumping at appeal, it might be the excuse the Government need to tut a bit about tax avoidance and blame the legal system for letting us off, while at the same time pointing out that this how the previous Governments tactics cause instability and uncertainty. Perhaps a little simplistic and naiive, but on we go regardless.
I think we all knew it was a "big ask" to expect them to repeal at this stage. I always said this was a longshot but we had nothing to lose.
We have lost nothing. But I think we have gained ground. The Government now know that we're not going away.Comment
-
I agree but did not expect teacher to hand our note to the class bully and say please deal with this......
Even a simple we are in no position to deal with this at the present time and feel that this is best dealt with in the courts would have been better than what they sent.....
We are no better or worst off just a little surprised by the reaction from the government.
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostIMHO, not at all simplistic or naive.
I think we all knew it was a "big ask" to expect them to repeal at this stage. I always said this was a longshot but we had nothing to lose.
We have lost nothing. But I think we have gained ground. The Government now know that we're not going away.I don't believe it.........Comment
-
Originally posted by patbikeruk View PostI agree but did not expect teacher to hand our note to the class bully and say please deal with this......
Even a simple we are in no position to deal with this at the present time and feel that this is best dealt with in the courts would have been better than what they sent.....
We are no better or worst off just a little surprised by the reaction from the government.
I also find it insulting that MPs are sending out a standard response as though it had been written by them. We asked for a response from the Government, and instead we get something which is not attributable to anyone.
I'm going to confront my MP about this and ask where she got this letter from.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment