BN66 - the road to Judicial Review

[DonkeyRhubarb]

Maximum discretion please

Please be very careful what you discuss on here, especially any information from outside the forum.

Our "friends" are continually monitoring.

[smalldog]

Hi hector, have a good weekend!!

Im certainly going to have a better one than Ive had in a while, even if the weather is doing its upmost to spoil things....be good once all this is over to get some figures on how much this battle has cost the tax payer...sure they would be really pleased to know how much has been wasted, what with the public purse being in a bit of a sticky one..

[Alan Jones]

Bankruptcy

Some of you Guys just don't get it.

If Montpelier win (i.e. if i lose my Appeal in March 2010) then i will be made bankrupt .

If i win then i will NOT be bankrupt but will NOT make money out of it.

I have to put my best case forward. Only truthful submissions will be considered.

It is not a grudge match or battle. Montpelier sued me . I believe they were wrong and i have to defend their allegations or lie down and "die".

That's it and nothing else. Whatever other spin other parties put on it or give to DR to post is irrelevant.

The large and almighty Montpelier thought they could give me a good kicking. They might end up succeeding but i am fighting to the bitter end - just like you guys.

[Cosmo]

I very much doubt DR would be ever told what to post or indeed post something he didn't see as fact or truth.

If you are appealing, Montpelier must have already won.

Let it go.

[KiwiGuy]

Some of you Guys just don't get it.

If Montpelier win (i.e. if i lose my Appeal in March 2010) then i will be made bankrupt .

If i win then i will NOT be bankrupt but will NOT make money out of it.

I have to put my best case forward. Only truthful submissions will be considered.

It is not a grudge match or battle. Montpelier sued me . I believe they were wrong and i have to defend their allegations or lie down and "die".

That's it and nothing else. Whatever other spin other parties put on it or give to DR to post is irrelevant.

The large and almighty Montpelier thought they could give me a good kicking. They might end up succeeding but i am fighting to the bitter end - just like you guys.

Hey Alan,

I dont blame you defending yourself, no one wants to go bankrupt, i think what people dont like is the fact your were helping the IR in their cause, if you had wanted respect from this forum, you would have sat in the back like the rest of us and taken your fight to MP at a later date.

You are 1 man at risk of going bankrupt....there are 2000 families at risk of going bankrupt here due to HMRC restrospective change.... i cant understand why you cant see that?

Every man has a right to his day in court....the fact is those 2 days werent your days, they were ours.

I wish you all the best in the future....just stay out effecting mine.

[Rhydd]

Hug an Administrator

As the Administrator says, if anyone turns up with a search warrant (or whatever the appropriate legal paperwork is), then he/she has no alternative but to hand over information. That will also be true of a private board.

I agree with the view that we are better off assuming that this board can be read by anyone, and that we should bear that in mind when we post.

Personally, I'm grateful to the Administrator for running this board. Thank you, we wouldn't be here without you.

[OnYourBikeGB]

Hey Alan,

I dont blame you defending yourself, no one wants to go bankrupt, i think what people dont like is the fact your were helping the IR in their cause, if you had wanted respect from this forum, you would have sat in the back like the rest of us and taken your fight to MP at a later date.

You are 1 man at risk of going bankrupt....there are 2000 families at risk of going bankrupt here due to HMRC restrospective change.... i cant understand why you cant see that?

Every man has a right to his day in court....the fact is those 2 days werent your days, they were ours.

I wish you all the best in the future....just stay out effecting mine.

Well said. You have made it very clear you have had and face severe personal issues, through this mess. So do we, but we are sticking together, you are helping those trying to destroy us. What do you expect? Sympathy?

[smalldog]

yep, I have no issue with someone trying to prevent themselves going bankrupt, thats all we are doing after all.

I just dont like the whole trying to do a deal with HMRC to our potential detriment, it just stinks Alan.

[SantaClaus]

Personally I would like you to publish the original PM you sent me, SantaClaus and the other person(KiwiGuy?). I have lost my copy - I always did struggle to keep my PMs under 50 but I know it was late Aug/Early Sep 2008. I personally felt that we were given no choice. You made no mention of the negotiations withe the police in that PM. The impression was "the police asked us and we complied".

Unforunately I don't have the PMs either,Brillo.

I'm all for "transparency" though, a word that HMRC have never heard of.

[normalbloke]

Some of you Guys just don't get it.

If Montpelier win (i.e. if i lose my Appeal in March 2010) then i will be made bankrupt .

If i win then i will NOT be bankrupt but will NOT make money out of it.

I have to put my best case forward. Only truthful submissions will be considered.

It is not a grudge match or battle. Montpelier sued me . I believe they were wrong and i have to defend their allegations or lie down and "die".

That's it and nothing else. Whatever other spin other parties put on it or give to DR to post is irrelevant.

The large and almighty Montpelier thought they could give me a good kicking. They might end up succeeding but i am fighting to the bitter end - just like you guys.

Hmm I wouldn't bang on about your appeal too much on this Forum. Maybe if you give us all the date/time its happening, then I'm sure a few of the guys here would maybe come and "support" you the same way as you "supported" us last week...with or without the classic "I am Spartacus!" cameo performance.

Unfortunately, your appeal is your problem. BN66 is ours. So I suggest you stay out of it.