• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back (Chapter 3)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
    It's a good idea, but we need someone who really stands to be bankrupted and not afraid of publicity in front of friends and family. That counts me out I'm afraid
    I am quite happy to go before the cameras : in fact I did it once for f4j. I was on the main news bulletins.

    How do I contact them?

    Comment


      Under the newspapers logic, if you earn more that 30,000 a year you are 'super rich'. The news will just spin it as rich fat cats paying what is due after trying to rip off the taxpayer.

      How much sympathy are the bankers in the USA getting for the 90% retrospective tax on last years bonus?

      Comment


        Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
        I am quite happy to go before the cameras : in fact I did it once for f4j. I was on the main news bulletins.

        How do I contact them?
        http://www.itv.com/News/tonight/Contactus/default.html

        Comment


          You can watch the program on ITV player:

          http://www.itv.com/ITVPlayer/30DayCa...ilter=6/4/2009

          At the end, Jonathan Maitland mentioned that the HMRC admitted when he made a freedom of information request, that each year 100 bankruptcies issued by HMRC were annulled.

          I will make a comment, if I received a bankruptcy petition from HMRC when I disputed the amount, I would attend the hearing personally (or write to the judge stating that the money is not owed) and tell the Judge that I did not owe the money. It is then up to HMRC to prove to the judge that the amount owed is correct. The problems is 99.9% of people do nothing, so the petition automatically goes through as it has not been "disputed".

          Comment


            Email address: tonight@itv.com

            Re: The news will just spin it as rich fat cats paying what is due after trying to rip off the taxpayer.

            That has been done to death recently. People are bored. In any case, that story is only interesting if you can point to fat cats that people recognise.

            Much more juicy to expose HMRC shear incompetence, and how they will even resort to time travel to cover up their own ineptitude.

            Comment


              Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
              Email address: tonight@itv.com

              Re: The news will just spin it as rich fat cats paying what is due after trying to rip off the taxpayer.

              That has been done to death recently. People are bored. In any case, that story is only interesting if you can point to fat cats that people recognise.

              Much more juicy to expose HMRC shear incompetence, and how they will even resort to time travel to cover up their own ineptitude.
              wonder what Brannigans answer would be if requested for TV interview, I think he'd probably melt in sunlight.

              Comment


                Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                I am quite happy to go before the cameras : in fact I did it once for f4j. I was on the main news bulletins.

                How do I contact them?
                It would be good to have some backup here. If we can get and prove enough people are affected they could have a whole programme about us? I would join you BP but my last remaining assets are joint assets with a new partner where we both have children from previous marriages. I care more about them than I do these issues. I know that makes me good to go for it but I'm not up for exposing them - I'm lucky, i have a new life.

                [For those that are not aware, I "lost" most of my assets on a divorce settlement a few years ago. I invested/deposited the tax that I had "saved" as a result of the scheme - until I got divorced that is, when the ex got most of the assets because, apparently, her ability to work was impaired by bringing up the children. My offer to bring them up AND work was not accepted.] My dear Mr B, go look elsewhere. Is there a f**k you emoticon?
                Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                Comment


                  Originally posted by poppy01 View Post
                  wonder what Brannigans answer would be if requested for TV interview, I think he'd probably melt in sunlight.
                  There's no way HMRC higher ups would let someone like him anywhere near a reporter, or a courtroom for that matter!!!

                  His "work" (writing letters!) is done now, so I don't suppose we'll hear from him much in future.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Emigre View Post
                    I invested/deposited the tax that I had "saved" as a result of the scheme - until I got divorced that is, when the ex got most of the assets because, apparently, her ability to work was impaired by bringing up the children.
                    There was a test case about this recently. Apparently, creditors can go after former spouses to recover debts where there was an unequal divorce settlement, so your ex might be in for a nasty surprise!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                      There's no way HMRC higher ups would let someone like him anywhere near a reporter, or a courtroom for that matter!!!

                      His "work" (writing letters!) is done now, so I don't suppose we'll hear from him much in future.
                      So he's been retired on a Fred type pension?
                      Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                      "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X