• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Time to fight back: Continued

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Closed forum anyone?
    No need, just try thinking for a change. You may well win this case. After all, miracles have happened: Geoff Jones won Arctic and 23 hours later it was announced that NL would change the law so that Arctic's win would , in effect, be reversed.

    If you lot really think that HMRC will stop their attack simply becuase they lose one case, you're more deluded than I thought.
    Blog? What blog...?

    Comment


      #92
      Thinking of paying on account?

      Sorry for repeating this but I think it's important.

      Up to now we have assumed that a refund of a POA might attract a better rate of interest than cashing in a CTD but now I'm not so sure.

      If you are contemplating POA, get some advice from MontP/accountant before you do something you might end up regretting.

      http://forums.contractoruk.com/626768-post85.html

      The above may not apply in our case but it's definitely worth checking. You can't change your mind once you've made a POA.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by malvolio View Post
        If you lot really think that HMRC will stop their attack simply becuase they lose one case, you're more deluded than I thought.
        Do you read any of the posts on here? Or just troll?

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by malvolio View Post
          No need, just try thinking for a change. You may well win this case. After all, miracles have happened: Geoff Jones won Arctic and 23 hours later it was announced that NL would change the law so that Arctic's win would , in effect, be reversed.

          If you lot really think that HMRC will stop their attack simply becuase they lose one case, you're more deluded than I thought.
          you know f**k all dude...
          arctic won the case period. they changed the law prospectively.
          totally different...

          i'm all for a closed forum if the likes of this git are excluded

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by poppy01 View Post
            you know f**k all dude...
            arctic won the case period. they changed the law prospectively.
            totally different...

            i'm all for a closed forum if the likes of this git are excluded
            or even just that specific one in my book.

            Comment


              #96
              Cut It Out!!!

              Jeez!!!...please lets not start this all over again...

              Mal, some of your posts in the past have been highly valuable and instigated some interesting discussion...but now you're just taking the michael....we just don't want your input any more...your not saying anything new, just repeating yourself...if it turns out you were right and we got it completely wrong, then fine...at that time, come and tell us 'I told you so'...but between now and then, please leave the room...or watch from a distance...but no more posts please...

              as for the rest of you...FFS, STOP RISING TO THE BAIT!

              can someone please create a smiley of 2 heads being banged together!

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by TheGadgetMan View Post
                Jeez!!!...please lets not start this all over again...

                Mal, some of your posts in the past have been highly valuable and instigated some interesting discussion...but now you're just taking the michael....we just don't want your input any more...your not saying anything new, just repeating yourself...if it turns out you were right and we got it completely wrong, then fine...at that time, come and tell us 'I told you so'...but between now and then, please leave the room...or watch from a distance...but no more posts please...

                as for the rest of you...FFS, STOP RISING TO THE BAIT!

                can someone please create a smiley of 2 heads being banged together!
                I'm beginning to wonder if Malvio IS the man we used to talk about from the revenue.

                He disappeared shortly before and during this week's little bit of excitement and now the excitement is over, he's back.
                'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
                Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
                  I'm beginning to wonder if Malvio IS the man we used to talk about from the revenue.

                  He disappeared shortly before and during this week's little bit of excitement and now the excitement is over, he's back.
                  OK, fine, don't listen. I'm not a troll, I have sod all interest in how you get on beyond the potential for collateral damage, which is significant, not that that will cross your rose-tinted horizons


                  OK, I'm gone, have fun, hope not too many of you lose your houses. And take yourselves off to a private forum and stop embarrasing yourselves out here in the real world.
                  Last edited by malvolio; 9 September 2008, 23:35.
                  Blog? What blog...?

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by TheGadgetMan View Post
                    Jeez!!!...please lets not start this all over again...

                    Mal, some of your posts in the past have been highly valuable and instigated some interesting discussion...but now you're just taking the michael....we just don't want your input any more...your not saying anything new, just repeating yourself...if it turns out you were right and we got it completely wrong, then fine...at that time, come and tell us 'I told you so'...but between now and then, please leave the room...or watch from a distance...but no more posts please...

                    as for the rest of you...FFS, STOP RISING TO THE BAIT!

                    can someone please create a smiley of 2 heads being banged together!
                    This is another problem with an open forum. Lets get one thing straight - I will post what I want when I want until I am warned/banned by admin.

                    There are many lurkers - I even know a few personally! Mal knows quite alot - I am not sure why on this thread he posts such nonsense over certain issues when he is TITALLY(sic) wrong over specific points.

                    Comment


                      I am not sure why on this thread he posts such nonsense over certain issues
                      Could be that some of MP's spokesmen on this thread are leading people into thinking it's all done and dusted when, in fact, it is more than likely that if Hector fails to get his view imposed regarding BN66 he will simply write a new rule to cover it. And like FBT, that new rule will almost certainly drag a lot more people into the net who are not affected by BN66.

                      Like I said, I could care less. But yours and others' loud protestations over someone reasonably well informed presenting an opposing view to MP's utopian one should make people think about your own motivation.

                      Anyway, go play in your own sandpit and leave me out of it.
                      Blog? What blog...?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X