Originally posted by malvolio
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back!!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View Posteh? let us say we win. they will close the scheme (montp closed anyway). we go elsewhere. Sorted lovely jubly.
You can still go to an MSC you know, it's perfectly legal. It's just that they can only you pay you after deducting full PAYE and NICs. Of course, no chance that could happen to offshore income, could it. I mean, they wouldn't even know who to go looking for to pay it...Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostYeah right.
You can still go to an MSC you know, it's perfectly legal. It's just that they can only you pay you after deducting full PAYE and NICs. Of course, no chance that could happen to offshore income, could it. I mean, they wouldn't even know who to go looking for to pay it...Comment
-
Malvolio
Malvolio -- whose name means "evil-wishing" in Latin
http://isebeta.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/p...elancholy.html
Enough said.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostMalvolio -- whose name means "evil-wishing" in Latin
http://isebeta.uvic.ca/Library/SLT/p...elancholy.html
Enough said.
The point is, and it is a subtle one but nevertheless valid, that I don't actually mean anyone any harm and I'm not out to make anyone look stupid; after all, quite a few do that all by themselves. The aim is to make people think and consider all the angles - and that includes understanding just what it is they are opposing.
Brillo understands where I'm coming from, even if he doesn't agree with me: perhaps you should listen to him...?Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostI am not entirely convinced about loan schemes. But I am still thinking. I am very stupid and these things take me a while.
Typically on, say a normal city rate of £150,000, how much tax would be paid, using a scheme like this?Comment
-
Hey, well done. It's only taken you 5 years to work that one out...
I've only been registered since March.
Brillo understands where I'm coming from, even if he doesn't agree with me: perhaps you should listen to him...?
I'm surprised you would cite Brillo as he's one of the very few on this forum who persists with the scheme. I left nearly 5 years ago as soon as the enquiries started.
If I could turn the clock back I would have stuck with my Ltd Co but back in 2001 this seemed even more risky. I know someone personally who was investigated over IR35 and it wasn't pretty. Also, I will admit that at the time I was pissed off with the government and was happy to stick 2 fingers up to them. With the benefit of hindsight I probably would have thought twice.
I'm sure you are probably an OK guy but can you see it from our position? Even if a few of us do what you think is the "right thing" it isn't going to stop MTM pursuing this through the courts, as they are representing at least 1600 people. We are where we are and all we can do is wait and see how it turns out.
IMHO, I can't understand why anyone would use a scheme now when IR35 is so well understood, and it is relatively straightforward to operate outside it and insure yourself against being investigated. But things were very different 7 years ago.
By the way, are you a fellow sheep shagger?Comment
-
Problem with the loan scheme's is that you do not have any right to your money.
The organisers of the scheme could easliy recall all the loads and p*ss off with all your money, you would have no legal come back since if you had any entitlement to the money you would pay tax and NI.Comment
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostHey, well done. It's only taken you 5 years to work that one out...
The point is, and it is a subtle one but nevertheless valid, that I don't actually mean anyone any harm and I'm not out to make anyone look stupid; after all, quite a few do that all by themselves. The aim is to make people think and consider all the angles - and that includes understanding just what it is they are opposing.
Brillo understands where I'm coming from, even if he doesn't agree with me: perhaps you should listen to him...?Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostBy the way, are you a fellow sheep shagger?Blog? What blog...?Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment