In the recent letter from Mr Brannigan there was talk of a "jeopardy assessment". Not sure what this is. Anyone care to explain? Something to do with HMRC being able to seize assets perhaps?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Time to fight back!!!
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostLike you, I wrote before the bill was passed, so it wouldn't be appropriate to write again so soon.
But IMO, anyone who hasn't already written to their MP should do so now.
Has anyone written to Nick Hurd about this?Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBarCapBoyz View PostIn the recent letter from Mr Brannigan there was talk of a "jeopardy assessment". Not sure what this is. Anyone care to explain? Something to do with HMRC being able to seize assets perhaps?
Also, Kerry Katona got her liability reduced from £400K to under £100K. Any idea how and why this would happen.
Is she really bankrupt, or just managed to put all assets into a trust etc?Comment
-
Originally posted by TheBarCapBoyz View PostIn the recent letter from Mr Brannigan there was talk of a "jeopardy assessment". Not sure what this is. Anyone care to explain? Something to do with HMRC being able to seize assets perhaps?
<paragraph deleted in case it leads to my banning>Comment
-
Originally posted by ContractIn View PostHas anyone written to Nick Hurd about this?
You may want to use this as a starting point.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/622437-post1750.htmlComment
-
Originally posted by TheBarCapBoyz View PostIn the recent letter from Mr Brannigan there was talk of a "jeopardy assessment". Not sure what this is. Anyone care to explain? Something to do with HMRC being able to seize assets perhaps?
If the Secretary believes that the assessment or collection of a deficiency . . . will be jeopardized by delay, he shall . . . immediately assess such deficiency . . . and notice and demand shall be made by the Secretary for the payment thereof.Confusion is a natural state of beingComment
-
Tax years
Can anyone tell me which tax years are currently being investigated and leeters being sent by HMRC ?
I assume it is 2006/07 and then previous years as returns for 2007/08 have not been submitted yet.Comment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostIt is indeed to do with seizing assets. Apparently threating this works in montp's favour! I assume you forwarded onto montp? Did you get any response from them?
<paragraph deleted in case it leads to my banning>
Be prepared for more intimidation tactics.
Incidentally, is anyone else a bit suspicious as to why we haven't received closure notices yet? I know they've probably been on holiday but even so it's 7 weeks since the Finance Bill was passed. Perhaps the buggers are up to something?Comment
-
Letter Sent.
I have sent my letter as suggested, if we all do this it may help in the long run. It takes a couple of minutes at no cost!
Here's my letter to help others word theirs.
With the introduction of the back-dated legislation from the 2008 finance bill regarding off-shore partnerships (Clause 55) I felt I needed to write to you.
Since parliament have approved this legislation me and my family have been affected both financially and physically. I have received a number of harshly written letters from the HMRC causing considerable anxiety to me and my wife and the very real possibility of financial ruin. I am being told that I am acting unlawfully from a law that has been introduced retrospectively. I would never consider doing anything unlawful and I believe I haven’t. Surely my human rights are affected when told you are breaking a law before the law was actually introduced?
I have taken legal advice from a leading Tax Counsel who is of the opinion this step of back-dating legislation is unlawful. In their view, the Government has resorted to retrospective measures because HMRC were unwilling to risk litigation on the matter. They intend to challenge this clause through a Judicial Review.
I don’t know if you can help in this matter or support any review. But I felt you should be made aware of what was happening to decent law abiding people like me.Comment
-
Also write to the Finance Committee Members asking them to explain themselves
... especially the labour members and also write to the PM, Chancellor and the finance minister. Keep this issue in their minds.
Outlining how this will personally affect you may be a good route forward.
Does anybody have the response from David Cameron that I heard about? Can you post an extract?
I just got another reply... from Justine Greening:
"
David Gauke MP did raise some serious concerns about the retrospective aspect of this legislation on the Finance Bill Committe itself, hence the vote that we forced. As you point out, to retrospectively tax in this way (and the government did it similarly with Vehicle Excise Duty, which was a clause I covered), damages trust and also damages the reputation of the UK as a good place to live and do business. We have to have confidence in our tax system if it is to function effectively.
I'm sure David Gauke can hopefully add to my comments and in particular regarding future plans.
Meantime, I can assure you will we continue to hold Treasury Ministers to account on this matter and their other examples of shambolic performance over the coming months.
Best wishes,
Justine Greening MP
"
Most importantly though - !!write to your MP!!Sunt Lacrimae RerumComment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment