Newbie here! I contract through a Limited company of which I am sole director. I live in Southern England but my new 6 month contract is in Scotland - which is a bit of a hike! What is the situation if I take out a 6 month let in the companies name in Scotland whilst keeping my house in the South as my permanent residence? Would I be able to put all the cost plus bills through the company or would I have to deem the weekends as personal use and only be able to claim 5/7ths through the company? Obviously a 6 month let is far cheaper than the current accomodation, meal and travel costs. Anyone able to help?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contract requires relocation
Collapse
X
-
-
-
I put everything to do with the house I rent through the business - except for the TV licence and sky
Comment
-
I'd ensure that Sky and TV License were "included" in the rent. Most landlords will be amenable to this.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
Scotty land is a lovely place you'll not need Sky.
I do it in reverse when working in Englandshire, rent goes through the company but I do not see why utilities should go through the company, I've usually paid them myself. Have you asked your client with helping out with the rent? Honestly have done it once and got it them to pay it. Don't ask don't get..."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Sky is not an option - my other half is Scottish and won't let it in the house!! Mind you with the whole of Scotland to explore who has time for Sky?
My main concern is what Mr HMRC will think. My inclination is to put the rent and utilities (including phone and broadband) under the company and pay the TV licence myself. I just don't want Mr HMRC to suddenly demand 2/7ths of the costs from me as an individual! The contract is already signed so claiming expenses from the client is not an option, I knew I would have to absorb the costs its just whether it is the company or me that needs to pay!Comment
-
If you are there for business then why should you pay for the utilities personally?
Luxuries (sky, etc) yes, but utilties (gas, water, electric) then put through the company.Comment
-
Because I feel my place of work is at the clients site not the house where I'm living."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Because I believe Gordon is God and I want to give him all my money.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostBecause I feel my place of work is at the clients site not the house where I'm living.
Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
-
this is an approach that can be used in a number of ways. I well remember a 6 month stay at the Brighton Metropole which included english breakfast and 3 course carvery meal every day, but was billed as "special bed and breakfast". As dinner was supposed to come out of our daily allowance (I was permie at the time) we all made a packet that summer...Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostI'd ensure that Sky and TV License were "included" in the rent. Most landlords will be amenable to this.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10
- Is Reporting Company Payments to Participators a concerning consultation for contractors? Apr 29 07:38
- Now it’s finally here, how is HMRC Joint & Several Liability risk being managed, and is payment control the holy grail? Apr 28 06:55
- How Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are hit by HMRC’s Joint & Several Liability Apr 27 06:08

Comment