Originally posted by eek
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Legal action / Mislead contract was outside IR35
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostSo back to my original question, should the supplier be taken to court for not doing this properly?
let us know how you get on.Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostSo back to my original question, should the supplier be taken to court for not doing this properly?
Hint, you can't as they don't owe you any money and they aren't responsible for your personal or your limited company's tax affairs...
As I stated above - Life's unfair - live / deal with it
In this case you have 2 options:-
1) pay the correct amount of tax that you should have done with an inside IR35 contract
2) do nothing, walk away and hope HMRC don't come knocking (I actually wish they did more often as we wouldn't be in the mess that's about to appear).merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostHow do you do that?
Hint, you can't as they don't owe you any money and they aren't responsible for your personal or your limited company's tax affairs...
As I stated above - Life's unfair - live / deal with it
In this case you have 2 options:-
1) pay the correct amount of tax that you should have done with an inside IR35 contract
2) do nothing, walk away and hope HMRC don't come knocking (I actually wish they did more often as we wouldn't be in the mess that's about to appear).
When you get to the point you realise that sh*t this is inside; Do you just call it quits and pay your taxes and let them get away with it?Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostSo back to my original question, should the supplier be taken to court for not doing this properly?
So no, the supplier shouldn’t be taken to court.
But since you don’t seem to want to hear that, I will simply repeat BR14:
Go for it.
Let us know how you got on..."I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...Comment
-
Originally posted by cojak View PostIt will cost you a lot of money and it’s highly likely that you will lose.
So no, the supplier shouldn’t be taken to court.
But since you don’t seem to want to hear that, I will simply repeat BR14:
Go for it.
Let us know how you got on...
In April everything changes though so the thing the OP wants (i.e. the end client and agency taking responsibility) is about to happen.
And look how well that is currently working out...merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostI've got substantial proof of this being an inside IR35.
This is the kind of case (where people know they are inside IR35 but don't pay the tax) that leads to sledgehammers to crack walnuts like we're going to get in April.I'm not fat, I'm just fluffy.Comment
-
Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostPay your tax and National Insurance then. It's your responsibiltiy to hve determined the status, and your responsibility to pay the right tax.
This is the kind of case (where people know they are inside IR35 but don't pay the tax) that leads to sledgehammers to crack walnuts like we're going to get in April.
When you get to the point you realise that sh*t this is inside; Do you just call it quits and pay your taxes and let them get away with it?Comment
-
So you want to make a fuss for no reason except flag to HMRC that you owe them a tulip load of tax??
Wow. Makes JtBs case look vaguely sensible in comparison.
If you start taking agencies to court over contracts that are outside but work conditions are inside? A vast majority of contractors are in this position and are happy to try avoid HMRC to keep their money and you bring in it in the spotlight it's all a sham? If you win you'll be the most hated person in contracting.
First step is to prove to HMRC you are inside and pay them their tax. Let's see how that affects your desire to follow this up.
Just ridiculous.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by cyborg1337 View PostSo back to my original question, should the supplier be taken to court for not doing this properly?I'm not fat, I'm just fluffy.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment