Originally posted by ChimpMaster
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Did I miss something on Entrepreneurs Relief?
Collapse
X
-
That seems to be their objective over the past few years whatever socio-economic group you are in! We seem to be livening in very uncertain times and planning ahead is not that simple any more. -
Hi there, I am interested in this. Do we know if closing down via the MVL route then using an umbrella company in place of the limited company can be done without jeopardising the Entrepreneurs Relief ?Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostClose down and claim ER while you still can, and use a brolly until quitting the game if that horizon is near enough.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickX View PostHi there, I am interested in this. Do we know if closing down via the MVL route then using an umbrella company in place of the limited company can be done without jeopardising the Entrepreneurs Relief ?
Read elsewhere on here that HMRC currently don't view being employed in same arena as previously contracted through Ltd is a rejection for ER.
So looks possible to me but make sure you research fully before going down that route, then let us know how it worked out.
Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.Comment
-
Originally posted by NickX View PostHi there, I am interested in this. Do we know if closing down via the MVL route then using an umbrella company in place of the limited company can be done without jeopardising the Entrepreneurs Relief ?Just to keep repeating what has been said several times on here...the new two year rule does not relate directly to a claim for ER, but whether you can treat the extracted profit as *capital*.Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostRead elsewhere on here that HMRC currently don't view being employed in same arena as previously contracted through Ltd is a rejection for ER.
Capital treatment can still be favourable even without ER vs income treatment as you have a separate CGT allowance and the rates are lower than higher rate dividend tax.Comment
-
Thanks for the reply, I am still weighing this up, but at the moment I am thinking that continuing contracting through an umbrella isn't worth the risk of losing the benefit of the Entrepeneur's Relief so may just settle for retiring straight away.Originally posted by Hobosapien View PostRead elsewhere on here that HMRC currently don't view being employed in same arena as previously contracted through Ltd is a rejection for ER.
So looks possible to me but make sure you research fully before going down that route, then let us know how it worked out.
I will keep the forum posted though.Comment
-
Thanks for the response. Very good point as the penalities of the extracted profit being taxed as dividends would be even more costly than simply not getting the Entrepeneurs Relief.Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostJust to keep repeating what has been said several times on here...the new two year rule does not relate directly to a claim for ER, but whether you can treat the extracted profit as *capital*.
Because the MVL \ ER appears to be a very tax efficient way of extracting the funds I am now thinking its probably best not to do anything that could jeopardise this.Comment
-
Hi all,
I’m a one man-contractor ltd co. trying to understand my future ability to apply MVL, obtain entrepreneurs relief, and extract profits from my company at 10% CGT in about two years time.
Reason for wind up: leaving UK & going home, hence not planning on starting up any new companies within 2 years.
In two years time I'm expecting(hoping) to have ~£100k in retained cash upon wind up.
Does this sound like an open and shut case, or am I one of the ones in HMRC's sights for future changes to wind up relief?Comment
-
The changes are in the future so how would we know what HMRC have planned...Originally posted by Tinfed View PostHi all,
I’m a one man-contractor ltd co. trying to understand my future ability to apply MVL, obtain entrepreneurs relief, and extract profits from my company at 10% CGT in about two years time.
Reason for wind up: leaving UK & going home, hence not planning on starting up any new companies within 2 years.
In two years time I'm expecting(hoping) to have ~£100k in retained cash upon wind up.
Does this sound like an open and shut case, or am I one of the ones in HMRC's sights for future changes to wind up relief?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
We have crystal balls.Originally posted by eek View PostThe changes are in the future so how would we know what HMRC have planned..."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
I suppose I'm just wondering whether or not the relief was originally intended to benefit people in cases such as mine (where I'll be packing up shop to leave UK)?Originally posted by eek View PostThe changes are in the future so how would we know what HMRC have planned...
I've read some people believe HMRC will soon crack down on ER in future, not sure what they are basing their concerns upon, and whether these are centred around changes to anti-pheonixing rules, or more broadly to one person ltd co's in general?Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment