• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Pension of £100k a year?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    It makes you realise how unfair public sector pensions are when you compare final salary pension schemes to the ridiculously low pensions that most people will get from their defined contribution and SIPP schemes.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by dingdong View Post
      It makes you realise how unfair public sector pensions are when you compare final salary pension schemes to the ridiculously low pensions that most people will get from their defined contribution and SIPP schemes.
      Not all public sector pensions are great it depends on the job you do. So if you are some random admin your pension will be sh*t and you may need to continue working, there as if you are the head of an NHS trust you will be laughing all the way to the bank.

      Btw I know two people in that situation.
      "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

      Comment


        #23
        ... and many public sector employees have had what were initially final salary pensions converted into a career average pension, so it's not all sweetness and light.

        Comment


          #24
          Absolutely great that people build a pension to look after them in their old (or not so old!) age but I remember some of the old lifers in the Final Salary days when I worked at one of the big four banks who were going on about how good their pensions were from about their mid 40s and almost let everything else in their career be governed by it.

          I know it is different for contractors but there is a balance to be had between having a comfortable retirement and not enjoying yourself when you are young.

          Comment


            #25
            deferred-pleasure

            I am definitely against excessive pensions.
            Yes, you are deferring taxation but also yields and pleasure.
            There's some things that you won't enjoy in your old age as much, even if you survive that long.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by SussexSeagull View Post
              Absolutely great that people build a pension to look after them in their old (or not so old!) age but I remember some of the old lifers in the Final Salary days when I worked at one of the big four banks who were going on about how good their pensions were from about their mid 40s and almost let everything else in their career be governed by it.

              I know it is different for contractors but there is a balance to be had between having a comfortable retirement and not enjoying yourself when you are young.
              But, kind of missing the point there, somewhat. It was never a mutually exclusive situation. I paid 1% of salary into my final salary pension plan. I moved to another company, got a salary increase and there I paid 2%. In some blue chip companies the final salary pension was free. So you could have a decent pension and it really had no impact on you enjoying your life.
              Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
              Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by yasockie View Post
                I am definitely against excessive pensions.
                Yes, you are deferring taxation but also yields and pleasure.
                There's some things that you won't enjoy in your old age as much, even if you survive that long.
                For perspective, most people will have around 25-30 years retirement. I for one don't intend living off baked beans and wrapping up warm for all that time...

                As for public sector super pensions, I know someone who worked for the NHS for 42 years, ending up running a £50m a year budget across 100 staff and has a final salary pension of £28k a year. She was in the labs though, not administration...
                Blog? What blog...?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by malvolio View Post
                  For perspective, most people will have around 25-30 years retirement. I for one don't intend living off baked beans and wrapping up warm for all that time...

                  As for public sector super pensions, I know someone who worked for the NHS for 42 years, ending up running a £50m a year budget across 100 staff and has a final salary pension of £28k a year. She was in the labs though, not administration...
                  State pension is around £16k on top of that though so she should have a pension in the range of £44k a year.
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                    State pension is around £16k on top of that though so she should have a pension in the range of £44k a year.
                    Her state pension is around £130 a week with 40 years full NICs paid. So she will be above national average income. But the point is the press would report her as having retired with a £1m pension pot (a £100k fund gives about £3k a year pension); that money is there somewhere to generate the pension payment but it will never get to her bank account and it's certainly not her money.
                    Blog? What blog...?

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Good thread. A lot of FIRE sites champion a 4% withdrawal rate, which from an investment pot should never run out of money (if future returns bear any relation to previous ones).
                      Current thinking is that this is too much and 3% would be more prudent but I think 4% would be fine, I am convinced you need less and less money as you get older, houses paid off, ambitions more modest.
                      So - 25x annual expenses to have something left to pass on.
                      20x if you want your last cheque to bounce....

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X