Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
HMRCs new PS tool
Collapse
X
-
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRC -
Originally posted by RonBW View PostI refer you to the post I made some moments ago - according to people close to the project, until not so long ago the prospect of needing to retain an audit trail of what questions were asked and answered had not occurred to HMRC. According to the same people, there would be a number and an outcome available, and a release note of what version was in operation at the time of completing the tool, but no record of what answers had been given. And there would be no way for the client to get a copy of the questions asked and answered in the event of future need.
That may have changed in the past month, but I don't have faith in HMRC to have suddenly produced it out of thin air.
Having just done the test for my engagement, there is a great big "HMRC will not keep a record of this transaction for security reasons." at the end of it:
About this result
HMRC won’t keep a record of this transaction for security reasons.
HMRC will stand by the result given unless a compliance check finds the information provided isn’t accurate.First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRCComment
-
Originally posted by RonBW View PostCalled it
Having just done the test for my engagement, there is a great big "HMRC will not keep a record of this transaction for security reasons." at the end of it:
About this result
HMRC won’t keep a record of this transaction for security reasons.
HMRC will stand by the result given unless a compliance check finds the information provided isn’t accurate.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by RonBW View PostCalled it
Having just done the test for my engagement, there is a great big "HMRC will not keep a record of this transaction for security reasons." at the end of it:
About this result
HMRC won’t keep a record of this transaction for security reasons.
HMRC will stand by the result given unless a compliance check finds the information provided isn’t accurate.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostWhat result did you get - I saw that for one that was indetermined...First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRCComment
-
Originally posted by LondonManc View PostThey'll investigate anyone who is declaring outside where the same job role is declared inside elsewhere in the Public Sector. Don't worry about that.First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRCComment
-
Originally posted by RonBW View PostIs job role included in the data provided from the agency?The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by RonBW View PostIs job role included in the data provided from the agency?
Oh and unless it's changed - and the government changes slowly - they have lots of problems retaining data on .gov.uk websites. They also have to say legally whether it is or isn't retained as Liberty etc will go after them otherwise."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAsk your agency.
Given that there is no field for anyone to tell HMRC what the job is, how could HMRC tell that person A who got an outside determination is doing the same role as person Q, and therefore is worth an investigation?First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRCComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The JSL nub for umbrellas/agencies: who runs PAYE and who will HMRC bill? Today 18:16
- How HMRC’s umbrella company JSL rules will play out Aug 13 23:33
- As Small Business Commissioner, I invite unpaid limited company contractors to come forward Aug 13 17:50
- Is Labour just going to leave limited company contracting zombie-like, neither dead nor alive? Aug 12 22:56
- Contracting Awards 2025 unveils ‘stellar’ shortlist Aug 11 21:31
- If it’s JSL liability, it’s Managed Service Providers (MSPs) too, potentially Aug 8 02:54
- Labour's new anti-late payment package ‘a contractor confidence boost’ Aug 7 00:33
- MSC test cases: Feb 2026 spells certainty for Boox/CK contractors Aug 6 05:36
- Under JSL, agencies are ‘umbrella companies’ if no brollies are present Aug 4 23:06
- How to get paid by a closed (or closing) recruitment agency Aug 4 17:37
Comment