I have worked as a contractor through a limited company for many years on a straight hourly rate. When it has been necessary to claim expenses, the last time was 20 years ago my company claimed the expenses plus VAT.
Recently I have been waiting for a new contract to materialise. The client, large international construction company, was delayed signing his contract with his client. So I asked the agent to look out for short term contracts. He found one for 4 weeks that has turned into a 6 week contract finishing this week.
To make this simple my limited company is A, the agent is B, his client is C, C's client is E but E's sole agency for employing contract staff is D. So that is A-B-C-D-E.
Originally the role was to work from home or C's office in London with visits to E in the Midlands. The agent was negotiating the rate and the question of expenses came up. In the end the agent negotiated £x per day from home or London or £x+£100 if on E's site. Whilst this was going to be occasional visits it ended up with me on E's site every day so I benefit from weekly train season tickets.
Now C is asking me to claim expenses from E as he is paying the extra £100(plus mark up) per day to B. This has to be done via E's intranet site but D haven't issued me with a log on and D is impossible to deal with. C has asked me to contact E's HR but HR don't deal with contractors.
To be blunt I don't really care as I am getting paid. B has a purchase order so he is happy as despite getting threats from C he will call in the lawyers. I am happy to send a copy of receipts to C but I will be putting the original receipts through A's accounts as I have paid for the expenses personally and will put them through my books.
So how can C claim the same expenses as me. Seems C messed up by not negotiating the same deal with D.
Literally just come off the phone from my agent and it seems C is going to refuse to pay the higher rate to B unless the expenses are put through E which I can't do without access to E's intranet site.
A real pig's ear and makes you wonder what a contract is worth.
Recently I have been waiting for a new contract to materialise. The client, large international construction company, was delayed signing his contract with his client. So I asked the agent to look out for short term contracts. He found one for 4 weeks that has turned into a 6 week contract finishing this week.
To make this simple my limited company is A, the agent is B, his client is C, C's client is E but E's sole agency for employing contract staff is D. So that is A-B-C-D-E.
Originally the role was to work from home or C's office in London with visits to E in the Midlands. The agent was negotiating the rate and the question of expenses came up. In the end the agent negotiated £x per day from home or London or £x+£100 if on E's site. Whilst this was going to be occasional visits it ended up with me on E's site every day so I benefit from weekly train season tickets.
Now C is asking me to claim expenses from E as he is paying the extra £100(plus mark up) per day to B. This has to be done via E's intranet site but D haven't issued me with a log on and D is impossible to deal with. C has asked me to contact E's HR but HR don't deal with contractors.
To be blunt I don't really care as I am getting paid. B has a purchase order so he is happy as despite getting threats from C he will call in the lawyers. I am happy to send a copy of receipts to C but I will be putting the original receipts through A's accounts as I have paid for the expenses personally and will put them through my books.
So how can C claim the same expenses as me. Seems C messed up by not negotiating the same deal with D.
Literally just come off the phone from my agent and it seems C is going to refuse to pay the higher rate to B unless the expenses are put through E which I can't do without access to E's intranet site.
A real pig's ear and makes you wonder what a contract is worth.
Comment