• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

IR35 - Guilty as charged! - Updated May 2016 - NOT GUILTY!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View Post
    Personally, I'd recommend getting in touch with Assured Tax Consulting, run by Dave Smith formerly of Accountax. He's the one I would want on my side in a dispute.
    I'd second that, his track record is second to none.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      What is the point of taking out insurance for this, and then terminating it as soon as you need it?

      Something doesn't sound right here.

      He wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
        Look on the bright side - at least you didn't take the offshore route you were talking about three years ago
        I knew IR35 was a risk but offshore was just not the way.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Munchers View Post
          He wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.
          Give Assured Tax a call and explain. They may well be able to ask HMRC for an extension on the grounds of poor advice to date.
          ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

          Comment


            #15
            Can I ask how you came to be investigated?

            Comment


              #16
              I'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.

              Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.

              What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Munchers View Post
                He wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.
                Name please

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Munchers View Post
                  I'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.

                  Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.

                  What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?
                  Have a read through here: CH51300 - Assessing Time Limits: The Time Limits: What are the new time limits?

                  6 years from the end of the relevant period when there is an extended time limit.
                  ContractorUK Best Forum Adviser 2013

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Two contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.
                    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
                      Two contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.
                      It's neutral.

                      However, spelling HMRC incorrectly, posting in the wrong forum, and providing almost no useful information upfront wasn't a great start...

                      Following some of the above advice would be a good start, notably about having a specialist onside before the OP bungles this beyond the point of no return.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X