Originally posted by Clare@InTouch
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 - Guilty as charged! - Updated May 2016 - NOT GUILTY!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWhat is the point of taking out insurance for this, and then terminating it as soon as you need it?
Something doesn't sound right here.
He wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostLook on the bright side - at least you didn't take the offshore route you were talking about three years agoComment
-
Originally posted by Munchers View PostHe wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
-
I'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.
Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.
What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?Comment
-
Originally posted by Munchers View PostHe wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
Originally posted by Munchers View PostI'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.
Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.
What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?
6 years from the end of the relevant period when there is an extended time limit.Comment
-
Two contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTwo contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.
However, spelling HMRC incorrectly, posting in the wrong forum, and providing almost no useful information upfront wasn't a great start...
Following some of the above advice would be a good start, notably about having a specialist onside before the OP bungles this beyond the point of no return.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Yesterday 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
Comment