Originally posted by Clare@InTouch
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
IR35 - Guilty as charged! - Updated May 2016 - NOT GUILTY!
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostWhat is the point of taking out insurance for this, and then terminating it as soon as you need it?
Something doesn't sound right here.
He wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
I knew IR35 was a risk but offshore was just not the way.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostLook on the bright side - at least you didn't take the offshore route you were talking about three years ago
Comment
-
Give Assured Tax a call and explain. They may well be able to ask HMRC for an extension on the grounds of poor advice to date.Originally posted by Munchers View PostHe wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
-
I'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.
Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.
What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?Comment
-
Name pleaseOriginally posted by Munchers View PostHe wasn't working for us, or returning our calls / emails and didn't speak to me at all before drafting our response. I prepared an 8 page document giving points as to why I thought we were outside and he ignored the whole document. He just wasn't working in our best interests. We paid for another tax consultant who re-wrote our response after discussions with us and took on board the points I raised (some positive and some negative as he pointed out and explained). He was excellent and I just wish we hadn't taken the insurance that gave us the first 'tax consultant'.Comment
-
Have a read through here: CH51300 - Assessing Time Limits: The Time Limits: What are the new time limits?Originally posted by Munchers View PostI'm probably a bit pessimistic about chances as didn't realise we only need to prove one factor outside. I know the final letter challenges all areas so fingers crossed.
Either way I knew there was a risk, I can afford to deal with the issue if absolutely have to although it will hurt.
What I'm unclear on is what period will it cover. Am I right in saying they can go back 6 year (maximum) and if so when would this period start?
6 years from the end of the relevant period when there is an extended time limit.Comment
-
Two contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
It's neutral.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostTwo contracts covering 6 years? That's not a great start.
However, spelling HMRC incorrectly, posting in the wrong forum, and providing almost no useful information upfront wasn't a great start...
Following some of the above advice would be a good start, notably about having a specialist onside before the OP bungles this beyond the point of no return.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment