Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Foreign benefit scroungers!
Collapse
X
-
-
Public spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.
The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.<Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!Comment
-
Originally posted by petergriffin View PostPublic spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.
The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]Comment
-
Originally posted by GlenW View PostI haven't got a clue what this means.<Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!Comment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostOn people that are down on their luck when times are tough?
You make your own luckLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by petergriffin View PostPublic spending doesn't come from taxes anymore and it hasn't come for many years. It comes from printy-printy. Otherwise we would be in a much better state than today.
The "my taxes are spent on..." argument is pointless.
The government collects over 600 billion in tax each year.
Welfare abuse is estimated to cost the state a few million a year and 'extreme' cases of welfare use (single moms with 10 kids etc etc) cost another few million a year (note: million. Not billion). As such most of that 100 billion is basic legitimate use of welfare money that can't be dropped or skimmed by efficiency drives.
So if people want to assume their taxes are spent on it and that 'printy printy' covers other things that CAN be dropped, that's a legitimate assumption to make
FYI costs are here (it breaks down central and local costs into 2 different columns) http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/ye...c1n_40#ukgs302
It also makes it very obvious how stupid people look when they piss and moan about welfare tourism. 60 thousand foreigners claiming welfare makes sod all difference to the budget of a country of 60 million people.Last edited by NickyBoy; 19 January 2015, 16:58.Comment
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostYep - They can go and pick fruit. If they are physically incapable they can go out and sell it.
You make your own luck
Feck contracting, picking fruit is the new Forex!<Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!Comment
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostHarsh, but at the same time, true
Maybe we should encourage more of our benefits generational types to bog off abroad and claim in the lands of the EU taxpayer, possibly Scooter will appreciate funding them in his beloved land of the Boxhead.
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Originally posted by NickyBoy View PostWelfare costs about 60 billion a year.
The government collects over 600 billion in tax each year.
Welfare abuse is estimated to cost the state a few million a year and 'extreme' cases of welfare use (single moms with 10 kids etc etc) cost another few million a year (note: million. Not billion). As such, most of that 60 billion is basic legitimate, efficient use of welfare money that can't be dropped.
So if people want to assume their taxes are spent on it and that 'printy printy' covers other things that CAN be dropped, that's a legitimate assumption to make<Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!Comment
-
Originally posted by petergriffin View PostWhat fruit do you pick now in January? Where? How do you make money from it? I want a piece of the cake too.
Feck contracting, picking fruit is the new Forex!Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment