Hi all, I have a contract which had been agreed to but another agency has found out that my rate is higher than what they are paying their contractors, the agency I deal with was brought into a meeting with the client and has had to drop his rates to match the other agency and in doing so has reduced my rate can this be allowed?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Agency & Client vs Contractor
Collapse
X
-
-
Who has told you this? The agent? Assume he is lying through the back of his teeth until you have this confirmed with the client. Do you know what the client is paying the agent? This is key so you know if the agent is pulling a fast one or not. I can't help but think you are missing some key information here. I don't see what business it is of the other agent as to what your agent is paying you. That is between you are your agent. What it might be is that client is paying your agent more and the other agent has kicked off but again that is negotiation and cannot see how the other agent can complain.Originally posted by Mearcat View PostHi all, I have a contract which had been agreed to but another agency has found out that my rate is higher than what they are paying their contractors, the agency I deal with was brought into a meeting with the client and has had to drop his rates to match the other agency and in doing so has reduced my rate can this be allowed?
Something doesn't sound right here, either your explanation is missing some key facts or this is an outright lie from your agent.
Can you be a bit clearer with the facts?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
As Northernladuk says, it's not entirely clear what's going on here, but generally speaking:Originally posted by Mearcat View PostHi all, I have a contract which had been agreed to but another agency has found out that my rate is higher than what they are paying their contractors, the agency I deal with was brought into a meeting with the client and has had to drop his rates to match the other agency and in doing so has reduced my rate can this be allowed?
You will have a contract at £X per day/hour for Y months. The agency can not change this without your agreement.
However, they can ask that you accept an amendment to the contract and if you refuse then they will have to consider their options which would include cutting their margin, asking the client to pay more or terminating your contract.
You should speak to the client and ask them what's going on. My starting point would be that I had agreed the contract and I expect them to show good faith by honouring it not changing it half way through.
It could be the agency doing a fast one on you or it could be that the client is cutting the amount they are paying the agency and this cut is being passed on to you.
At the same time, you want to try and find out how much the agency is being paid and make sure their margin is reasonable, they should be taking 5-15% of the contract value at most. Tread very carefully here. Some clients will give you this information if you ask and others won't. The agency may also get very pissy if they know that you have found out.
This is a high stakes game, if you don't accept the rate cut then they may terminate your contract and you will have no redress other than to be paid for your notice period.
On the other hand, there are people on this forum, including me, who have fought and won a battle against rate cuts but you will only win if you are prepared to walk away from the contract and it can be a bloody battle. Remember, agents do this stuff every day and we do it quite rarely so decide now if you are willing to fight the fight.
Good luck!Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Thanks both for your input... It seems that someone working for the other agency found out the rate we were getting and complained that they are getting less, because of this the client wants both agencies to pay and charge the same rates, now that that the other agency has twice as many people working for the client the client wants my agency to lower its rates. I have also found out that my agency was trying to bring an overtime rate that starts after 39 hours instead of the 45 hours I was originally on (using AWRs new rules to coincide with the companies permanent staff) although I am a limited company and it does not affect me. I think he tried this tactic to boost rates. I have asked for a IR35 compliant contract with which he sent me a contract and a op out contract to fill (I know this is also quite unsound but to myself I feel like I am trying to work with IR35 compliance). I know that I am not entitled to the same details of a permanent staff member and I am happy to be on the original rates and terms etc. Now it turns out that he has been back in discussion with the client and says now that I am held in a contract where I am told what to do by the client and I have to work a set number of hours a week I am entitled to have the same pay structure as the permanent staff if I shut down my limited company and use an umbrella company. I now feel that the whole IR35 compliance thing was a complete farce and wonder if he could in fact be right about using AWR for my benefit or even going PAYE. I am now in discussion with a different agency about a different contract. It seems now that clients and agencies alike are exploiting all the conditions now at the expense of the contractor.Originally posted by Wanderer View PostAs Northernladuk says, it's not entirely clear what's going on here, but generally speaking:
You will have a contract at £X per day/hour for Y months. The agency can not change this without your agreement.
However, they can ask that you accept an amendment to the contract and if you refuse then they will have to consider their options which would include cutting their margin, asking the client to pay more or terminating your contract.
You should speak to the client and ask them what's going on. My starting point would be that I had agreed the contract and I expect them to show good faith by honouring it not changing it half way through.
It could be the agency doing a fast one on you or it could be that the client is cutting the amount they are paying the agency and this cut is being passed on to you.
At the same time, you want to try and find out how much the agency is being paid and make sure their margin is reasonable, they should be taking 5-15% of the contract value at most. Tread very carefully here. Some clients will give you this information if you ask and others won't. The agency may also get very pissy if they know that you have found out.
This is a high stakes game, if you don't accept the rate cut then they may terminate your contract and you will have no redress other than to be paid for your notice period.
On the other hand, there are people on this forum, including me, who have fought and won a battle against rate cuts but you will only win if you are prepared to walk away from the contract and it can be a bloody battle. Remember, agents do this stuff every day and we do it quite rarely so decide now if you are willing to fight the fight.
Good luck!Comment
-
Let the agents/client fight amongst themselves. It really isn't your problem.Originally posted by Mearcat View PostThanks both for your input... It seems that someone working for the other agency found out the rate we were getting and complained that they are getting less, because of this the client wants both agencies to pay and charge the same rates, now that that the other agency has twice as many people working for the client the client wants my agency to lower its rates. I have also found out that my agency was trying to bring an overtime rate that starts after 39 hours instead of the 45 hours I was originally on (using AWRs new rules to coincide with the companies permanent staff) although I am a limited company and it does not affect me. I think he tried this tactic to boost rates. I have asked for a IR35 compliant contract with which he sent me a contract and a op out contract to fill (I know this is also quite unsound but to myself I feel like I am trying to work with IR35 compliance). I know that I am not entitled to the same details of a permanent staff member and I am happy to be on the original rates and terms etc. Now it turns out that he has been back in discussion with the client and says now that I am held in a contract where I am told what to do by the client and I have to work a set number of hours a week I am entitled to have the same pay structure as the permanent staff if I shut down my limited company and use an umbrella company. I now feel that the whole IR35 compliance thing was a complete farce and wonder if he could in fact be right about using AWR for my benefit or even going PAYE. I am now in discussion with a different agency about a different contract. It seems now that clients and agencies alike are exploiting all the conditions now at the expense of the contractor.
The terms and rate has been agreed. Everyone was happy and signed their names on the dotted lines.
Think about the flip side... if you'd found out you were being paid LESS than other contractors from the other agency, do you think your agency would roll over and give you a rate rise?
Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1tComment
-
In my experience, it would be unusual though not unheard of for an agency to be acting in the best interests of the contractor unless there was something in it for them.Originally posted by Mearcat View PostNow it turns out that he has been back in discussion with the client and says now that I am held in a contract where I am told what to do by the client and I have to work a set number of hours a week I am entitled to have the same pay structure as the permanent staff if I shut down my limited company and use an umbrella company. I now feel that the whole IR35 compliance thing was a complete farce and wonder if he could in fact be right about using AWR for my benefit or even going PAYE.
There is a sticky about the pros and cons of the opt out which I presume you have read. If you are already working for the client then the law is pretty clear that you can NOT opt out.
As for the PAYE vs LTD question, there is less admin with an umbrella but you will pay more tax. There is a good net pay calculator which may help you make up your mind. Do not trust the calculations given to you by umbrella companies or you will be horribly disappointed.Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Today 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Yesterday 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41

Comment