Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Day rate skimming
Collapse
X
-
-
OK, you might want to read the contract you signed with the agent.Originally posted by mgrover View PostHe asked and I told.
You might also want to check whether he was telling you how much he was paying plus VAT, whether you are looking at how much ends up in your back pocket, how many intermediaries there are between you and him, etc, etc…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Doesn't seem to be anything in there about it.Originally posted by WTFH View PostOK, you might want to read the contract you signed with the agent.
You might also want to check whether he was telling you how much he was paying plus VAT, whether you are looking at how much ends up in your back pocket, how many intermediaries there are between you and him, etc, etc
But that VAT point is a very good ones actually. It would bring their margins inline with whats expected.
edit: No it doesn't include vat
edit1: hmm it may fall under what they define as confidential
“Confidential Information” means any information relating to the business and affairs of both the Company and the
Client and to the identity and business affairs of either parties’ customers and Clients and potential customers and
Clients which comes to either parties’ attention or possession and which both parties regard or could reasonably be
expected to regard as confidential, whether or not any such tangible information is marked ‘confidential’."
This doesn't fall under both the client and company so who knows.Comment
-
Skimming is the wrong word to use here imho. Absolutely creaming it is the correct terminology I think.
I would regard this as "peak" "creaming it" by the agency and you can't fault them for it... they are winning if they are successful at this with many suppliers, i.e. you.
As has previously been said, you need to learn to negotiate.. I picked up a contract recently (even in these times) and said I won't be working for quoted rate (and went quiet) they ultimately admitted their margin about £50 per day and we subsequently agreed on a better rate for me and less for them. it was still a significant haircut for me but it was still very much a case of meeting half way.
Just negotiate.. but also know the market and your skill demand and know when to hold and to fold. Pardon the cliche, but it's true.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment