Originally posted by youngguy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Thinking outloud - getting round the new PSC rules
Collapse
X
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI'd say that's a tool to aid delivery. Not core of the delivery so no.
But I bet that's the approach some will try to take to wriggle around the rules, dressing up deliverables in different ways to argue the case.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI'd say that's a tool to aid delivery. Not core of the delivery so no.
The issue here is that PSC assumes everyone is a bum on seat contractor doing the same job as other people in the building. Given that I'm both the subject matter expert, the specialist and the architect on the system what they are paying for is not me as a developer (that's only 50% of the money say) its the fact that I'm the expert that makes me worth the amount they have to pay for me....Last edited by eek; 7 September 2016, 12:36.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostAnd I'd agree with that - HMRC are probably thinking about 'raw materials'.
But I bet that's the approach some will try to take to wriggle around the rules, dressing up deliverables in different ways to argue the case.
99.99% don't deliver anything to even think about this let alone use it as wiggle room. The agents also won't understand it so won't help.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostYou and your betting. You'd have lost everything by now with the number of times you take a sweeping bet without thinking it through.
99.99% don't deliver anything to even think about this let alone use it as wiggle room. The agents also won't understand it so won't help.
I have seen similar stuff before. When G cloud hit and bunches of contractors started being part of managed services to duck certain rules. They did try to suggest (and even capitalise) deliverables were materials such as plans, training material etc.Comment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostWhat's a material? For example if I am a trainer and I produce a training manual as part of my delivery, is that a material?Comment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostI think in that case it goes back to what exactly are they paying for. Bringing someone in to run a training means paying someone £500 a day to use something that's taken them x years to learn...
The issue here is that PSC assumes everyone is a bum on seat contractor doing the same job as other people in the building. Given that I'm both the subject matter expert, the specialist and the architect on the system what they are paying for is not me as a developer (that's only 50% of the money say) its the fact that I'm the expert that makes me worth the amount they have to pay for me....Comment
-
Originally posted by youngguy View PostIf you have a product you then sell or customise for every client, doesn't that make you a provider/supplier rather than a Bos contractor?
Originally posted by youngguy View PostHaha, that's why I haven't retired yet, I lost it all!
I have seen similar stuff before. When G cloud hit and bunches of contractors started being part of managed services to duck certain rules. They did try to suggest (and even capitalise) deliverables were materials such as plans, training material etc.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostI'd say that's a tool to aid delivery. Not core of the delivery so no.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Originally posted by eek View PostHow did that work out?
Just more guesswork and fantasy with no basis or actual argument as usual. It's getting very tedious and taking more time to correct his statements than it is to focus on the actual topic. #nothelping.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
Comment