So this is essentially about the good of the many outweighing the good of the individual.
Should we band together under a code of ethics that tries to keep the quality of supply at a certain level? Protecting the contractor position as a business force that can be relied upon to deliver under the original terms of engagement?
Do we allow (can we stop) individuals being mercenary as you state and jumping for the best terms/cash position?
Is it down to each individual to decide how to run their business? Invoking notice clauses to pursue other interests at the cost of current relationship.
This may have an impact on the market and our reputation within it, but the state of affairs post 2016 may well shake the tree of all the dead leaves anyway, leaving (no pun intended) those of us who are in this for the long run and have the ability to build up our own reputation.
Personally, Ive done both. Stuck out a contract until the end and moved on and also left mid term, although the work was drying up and the writing was on the wall. there wasn't much of a lurch to leave anyone in...
I've also been cut early, business case shifted considerably and my position was no longer required.
To me, the flexible attitude needs to be in both directions. Employers need to start coming to terms with the real nature of flexible contract workers in that we can be brought in to do specific, required tasks and then binned but we can also leave of our own volition if the landscape shifts.
I don't, however, condone walking out mid deliverable when there is no handover and you are impacting the schedule or completion. That's bad business in anyone's book.
Should we band together under a code of ethics that tries to keep the quality of supply at a certain level? Protecting the contractor position as a business force that can be relied upon to deliver under the original terms of engagement?
Do we allow (can we stop) individuals being mercenary as you state and jumping for the best terms/cash position?
Is it down to each individual to decide how to run their business? Invoking notice clauses to pursue other interests at the cost of current relationship.
This may have an impact on the market and our reputation within it, but the state of affairs post 2016 may well shake the tree of all the dead leaves anyway, leaving (no pun intended) those of us who are in this for the long run and have the ability to build up our own reputation.
Personally, Ive done both. Stuck out a contract until the end and moved on and also left mid term, although the work was drying up and the writing was on the wall. there wasn't much of a lurch to leave anyone in...
I've also been cut early, business case shifted considerably and my position was no longer required.
To me, the flexible attitude needs to be in both directions. Employers need to start coming to terms with the real nature of flexible contract workers in that we can be brought in to do specific, required tasks and then binned but we can also leave of our own volition if the landscape shifts.
I don't, however, condone walking out mid deliverable when there is no handover and you are impacting the schedule or completion. That's bad business in anyone's book.
Comment