• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Time for a new workstation...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Joeman View Post
    ok, time for a new workstation.. what should i buy??
    Dell are the old favourite, any others i should consider??
    CPU - i5, i7, xeon?? so many choices!!
    What do you want to DO on your PC? If it's just writing your invoices and emails, splash out £400 for any old POS

    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
    Surely most people would go for a dedicated GPU on a workstation anyway.
    There's absolutely no point doing so if you don't play modern games or work in 3D graphics (or CUDA). These integrated graphics are 10X better than the Intel chipsets we all used to have i our Dell workstations a few years back - they are 'underpowered' only relative to the hard-to-understand-how powerful-they-really-are modern GPUs.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #12
      I used pcspecialist.co.uk for my last one, and specced it exactly how I wanted it.

      Rather than going Intel i7, I went with a 6-core AMD chip instead, which I (and the CUK massive) thought might give better performance for using multiple virtual machines concurrently.

      I cannibalised a few bits from the old machine - it already had two fairly new graphics cards, and I moved over three of the hard drives - to reduce costs a bit, but got a decent processor, new hard drive, lots of RAM etc.
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        There's absolutely no point doing so if you don't play modern games or work in 3D graphics (or CUDA). These integrated graphics are 10X better than the Intel chipsets we all used to have i our Dell workstations a few years back - they are 'underpowered' only relative to the hard-to-understand-how powerful-they-really-are modern GPUs.
        I guess I'm not the only one who assumes "onboard" means "crap".

        Looks like Overclockers have some good bundles. If only I could think of a reason. My 4 year old Core 2 Duo Dell Dimension is barely ticking over for what I use it for.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
          I guess I'm not the only one who assumes "onboard" means "crap".
          Indeed - and they certainly used to be, but the new generation on the i5/7 chips are a just that, a new generation.

          I write 3D apps and find the newest integrated GPUs from Intel are as fast as discrete GPUs (nVisia/ATI) from a couple of generations back. It IS all relative though, a top-end GPU might be 100X faster than an integrated chip, but GPUs have been beating Moore's Law.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #15
            I built a HTPC with an i3-530, the cheapest of the first generation core i CPUs, and that will drive 2 displays quite happily. I don't think you need a separate graphics card anymore unless you want more displays or you're doing something which needs hardcore 3D acceleration.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
              Looks like Overclockers have some good bundles. If only I could think of a reason. My 4 year old Core 2 Duo Dell Dimension is barely ticking over for what I use it for.

              The Core2Duo will be good enough for most tasks as not much causes the cpu to be the bottleneck.

              I was a little sad to see my Core2Duo demoted to spare kit after years of being rock solid. The following is what made me upgrade:

              1. The mobo could only support 2gb ram which isn't much these days.

              2. I wanted to do more with virtualisation so more cores made more sense, and a mobo that could support lots more ram.

              3. Video encoding is the only other area where I see a dramatic improvement following the upgrade.

              For most tasks the upgrade to SSD was much more noticeable.
              Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
              Feist - I Feel It All
              Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by PAH View Post
                The Core2Duo will be good enough for most tasks as not much causes the cpu to be the bottleneck.
                ....
                For most tasks the upgrade to SSD was much more noticeable.
                My trusty old ASUS M50 Laptop is a Core2Duo 2.5GHz, 4GB ram, and i upgraded to SSD.
                its a few years old now, but still going strong. As you say, the SSD upgrade was very noticeable!!

                It has a "windows Experience Index" of 4.8, because its let down by its graphics card, but the full score are below...

                Processor: 6.1
                Memory: 6.1
                Graphics: 4.8
                Gaming Graphics: 5.9
                Primary hard disk: 7.8

                How do newer machines compare??

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                  I used pcspecialist.co.uk for my last one, and specced it exactly how I wanted it.

                  Rather than going Intel i7, I went with a 6-core AMD chip instead, which I (and the CUK massive) thought might give better performance for using multiple virtual machines concurrently.

                  I cannibalised a few bits from the old machine - it already had two fairly new graphics cards, and I moved over three of the hard drives - to reduce costs a bit, but got a decent processor, new hard drive, lots of RAM etc.
                  WHS.

                  6-core Bulldozer + new M/B, case, ram, 2 new HDs

                  Bought cheap 1GB graphics card, swapped out my expensive(ish) graphics card from the old PC and built my new PC, with the old bits and new graphics card I built a perfectly reasonable PC for my Father-in-law.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Joeman View Post
                    ok, time for a new workstation.. what should i buy??
                    Dell are the old favourite, any others i should consider??
                    CPU - i5, i7, xeon?? so many choices!!
                    What's your budget?

                    Pre-built or Build Your Own?
                    Never has a man been heard to say on his death bed that he wishes he'd spent more time in the office.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Scrag Meister View Post
                      What's your budget?

                      Pre-built or Build Your Own?
                      Happy either way, budget = whatever it costs to get a good machine, but tigth wad side of my brain would limit to about 600quid (without monitors)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X