• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Linux vs Unix

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
    I personally think that Linux gets badly implemented because it's so easy for any total f'wit to download and install and then claim they're "experts" with no real/proven experience within an enterprise environment, then they go out and get a job with this so called "expertise".
    I think there's some truth in that, and I've seen it in Windows environments too.
    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
      I personally think that Linux gets badly implemented because it's so easy for any total f'wit to download and install and then claim they're "experts" with no real/proven experience within an enterprise environment, then they go out and get a job with this so called "expertise".
      Probably true, but when implemented correctly then I don't think that there is much difference between the two.

      Look at the Oracle Exalytics machine, which comes pre-configured on with Oracle Enterprise Linux:

      1 Tb of RAM (which could contain 5 to 10 Tb of compressed data)
      40 cores (4 x 10 Core Intel Xeon CPUs)
      Disk read rates of up to 200 Gb/sec
      40 Gbps Infiniband internal network
      1-10 GBps ethernet external network

      BI Foundation Suite: OBIEE
      In-memory parallel Analytics
      In-memory parallel Essbase
      In-Memory Parallel TimesTen

      Good hardware, good software, configured correctly and incredible analytical performance.
      Best Forum Advisor 2014
      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by northernspy View Post
        Still think its cheaper and if done right more reliable

        For example, Power7 is costed at approx £17K per CPU, and a standard 16 core AMD based rackmount is circa £6K which if you compare the spec.org ratings is equivalent to circa 5.4 Power7 CPU (assuming 65% utilisation)

        So for the half the cost of a 5 CPU Power7 LPAR (about £85K) you could build a nice resilient cluster of 4-5 x86 servers that will give you way more CPU grunt that the Power7 box...
        While what you say may be true, Oracle license by CPU. You've forgotten to factor that into your costing.
        And the lord said unto John; "come forth and receive eternal life." But John came fifth and won a toaster.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by b0redom View Post
          While what you say may be true, Oracle license by CPU. You've forgotten to factor that into your costing.

          Oracle can f#&k right off, playing silly buggers at the moment with red hat certification. Know of a few big customers that are seriously considering using more DB2 as a result
          Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by portseven View Post
            Oracle can f#&k right off, playing silly buggers at the moment with red hat certification.
            Certification of what Oracle product(s) on what RH version?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
              Certification of what Oracle product(s) on what RH version?
              It's Oracle 11.2 on RHEL6, basically Oracle have yet to respond to this

              redhat.com | Red Hat Submits Oracle 11gR2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Certification Test Results to Oracle

              It's a lot of posturing between the two companies as they are now competing in a number of areas, PiTA from a end user point of view
              Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!

              Comment


                #17
                Ah OK thanks. ClientCo are 11g on RHEL5, so was just curious.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by portseven View Post
                  It's Oracle 11.2 on RHEL6, basically Oracle have yet to respond to this

                  redhat.com | Red Hat Submits Oracle 11gR2 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Certification Test Results to Oracle

                  It's a lot of posturing between the two companies as they are now competing in a number of areas, PiTA from a end user point of view
                  Ah yes, Oracle dragged their feet with a benchmark on HP kit some time before their official fall out.
                  Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                    Look at the Oracle Exalytics machine, which comes pre-configured on with Oracle Enterprise Linux:
                    You've SEEN one of these? It's been announced but not yet shipped.

                    The Oracle Exa machines don't half cost a lot of money. I've seen some competitive info on these and Oracle like to fudge the numbers by underpricing its own software stack below what a customer would ever be asked to pay.

                    Nevertheless, the Exa machines are more of an appliance, so I don't think it's fair to compare the Linux on those with the general Linux version such as RHEL running on commodity H/W.

                    I've seen some convincing stuff on the TCO of big UNIX vs. Linux, and x86 Linux doesn't even get close, with things like AIX costing much less than Linux over 3 years or more.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Platypus View Post
                      The Oracle Exa machines don't half cost a lot of money.
                      Somewhere in the region of $90k from what I've been led to believe so far.

                      But don't quote me on that until it's on the price list
                      Best Forum Advisor 2014
                      Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                      Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X