• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Digital flatscreen TV's

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    We have a samsung 50 inch plasma thats about 4 years old. We just bought a samsung 60 inch smart Led tv for games and tv in the other sitting room. The new samsung led tv beats the old plasma in just about every way. The real bonus is that I hung the led tv on my own with a bad back and a bandaged foot because I had trod on a drill bit the previous week. It took 2 60mm screws and a 10mm drill bit. The plasma is hung on a steel cage that has 12 100mm coach bolts racheted into the stone fireplace. And took 3 of us to lift it onto the frame.

    Today you can buy the latest version of our plasma for about £500 but the smart tv's are more than 5 time the cost so take your pick.

    But stick to samsung or panosonic and. Buy it from John Lewis.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
      I finally bought a Sony 32" LCD earlier this year, and you'd have to be half-blind not to be able to spot the difference between HD and SD.

      Maybe so, due to SD programmes generally having poor bitrates (or even soft focused to make the equivalent HD channel look better ) so look poor compared to DVD, but I was thinking more of DVD vs Blu-ray.

      A good DVD master can be better than a poor blu-ray master as the TV upscales non-HD and I sometimes would have difficulty telling if a blu-ray was really true HD. And that's on a 50" TV sat less than 3 metres away. So it's only going to get worse on a smaller screen unless sat right next to it.

      Maybe I'm just going blind or the upscaling is working well, but I've stopped buying blu-rays just because they're blu-rays and still get DVDs when much cheaper than the blu-ray.
      Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
      Feist - I Feel It All
      Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
        define chavtastic sizes
        Anything bigger than 32" obviously.

        I sometimes think I should have gone for 37", or 40", especially as I now nearly always watch HD. Anything more than that is just a bit silly.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by PAH View Post
          Maybe so, due to SD programmes generally having poor bitrates (or even soft focused to make the equivalent HD channel look better ) so look poor compared to DVD, but I was thinking more of DVD vs Blu-ray.
          I can spot straight away that for example, BBC News on BBC One HD is all in SD. So the bitrate argument or compression argument doesn't apply, because it's an HD channel.

          But you are right in saying that Freeview/Sky SD TV could be an awful lot better if it weren't for the low bitrates. (Also if you have a Sky HD box, they've made a complete pigs ear of the HDMI SD support, it's actually better to use SCART!).

          A good DVD master can be better than a poor blu-ray master as the TV upscales non-HD and I sometimes would have difficulty telling if a blu-ray was really true HD.
          Not necessarily, Blu-ray players will upscale too. I've played with mine both ways, i.e. having the Blu-ray player upscale and the TV upscale when playing a DVD, and without being able to do a side-by-side test, I'm never quite sure what works out better.

          More pixels means more sharpness; SD can never beat HD on that. Blu-ray also has better compression system and a higher bitrate; in theory an SD Blu-ray should be far superior to DVD. But "better picture quality" covers a whole range of factors, and is all subjective anyway.
          Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
            I have a wall mounted Samsung 55" LED.
            <snip>
            Whippy, which model is this and how much would it cost?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by bobspud View Post
              We have a samsung 50 inch plasma thats about 4 years old. We just bought a samsung 60 inch smart Led tv for games and tv in the other sitting room. The new samsung led tv beats the old plasma in just about every way. The real bonus is that I hung the led tv on my own with a bad back and a bandaged foot because I had trod on a drill bit the previous week. It took 2 60mm screws and a 10mm drill bit. The plasma is hung on a steel cage that has 12 100mm coach bolts racheted into the stone fireplace. And took 3 of us to lift it onto the frame.

              Today you can buy the latest version of our plasma for about £500 but the smart tv's are more than 5 time the cost so take your pick.

              But stick to samsung or panosonic and. Buy it from John Lewis.
              Hey Bob, what's a smart LED TV? Is it really £3k for the 60"?

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
                Hey Bob, what's a smart LED TV? Is it really £3k for the 60"?
                It's one of these:

                8000 55 Inch Smart 3D LED TV | UE55D8000YUXXU | 8 Series LED TV - SAMSUNG UK - OVERVIEW

                It has a web interface an wifi to stream movies
                Looking at the model number it's actually a 55 rather than a 60 either way John Lewis priced matched it down to £2000 from £2700

                Comment


                  #18
                  We have a £750 (end of range) 2 year old 50" Panasonic Plasma. Reasonably priced LCD screens weren't good enough to compete at the time. Try both as they seem to be close now. I used Lakes who were very helpful.

                  We sit 8' away so it fills the view which is what a good tv should do. A smaller 'less chavtastic' TV would leave us staring at the wall around. We tried a hand me down 42" and it was annoying in the same place.

                  Size matters, Vectraman's opinion doesn't in this case. The vast majority of well off and cultured people I know have large TV's in their huge lounges so when they do get around to watching the tennis or Movies in their lounge they can do so in the best quality possible, they can afford it.

                  My opinion of the chavtasic tag - a 50" TV in a council flat is the issue, they should spend their money on better things like decent food for their kids.

                  Picture quality except blacks (they aren't perfect) is mainly dependant on the source on this TV, I can see the difference between broadcast HD & SD though its harder on upscaled DVD via the home theatre.

                  Bluray varies appreciably the test Blueray I used was 'The Dark Night' the opening sequence compared to DVD instantly reassures you about the benefits of Bluray & HD. Terminator Salvation day is good as well, 'The 300' is annoyingly encoded with 'snakes' .

                  I have 1 HDMI cable & 1 aerial connected to the TV, its slightly annoying switching sources via my HDMI switch but its future proofing and the TV hangs on the wall without cables which I feel looks right. The other gear is hidden away in a cabinet on the other side of the room.

                  I have freeview in the TV but HD Freeview & Satellite are in the HTPC as are internet, iplayer & games. When Canvas etc come on line will your TV be upgradeable? Maybe its wise to split now and buy a separate box? That is what I decided to do.

                  I could have spent £1500 on a Freesat HD enabled TV but I spent £500 on an HTPC I blew the other £250 on a Home theatre which give me great surround sound for movies and a blueray player (end of range again) They are both Panasonic so I can select source etc from the same remote which makes it slightly less annoying changing channels. That is what a smart TV is the ability to run a limited applications from the TV itself more flexibility comes from having a separate box.
                  Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                    Things with bright colours do look fantastic, but at times I almost wish I'd kept my old 15-year old CRT screen.
                    Still happy with my 9 year old Trinitron.

                    I'd have to rearrange all the furniture if I put a wacking great screen in.
                    Last edited by Sysman; 19 November 2011, 17:08.
                    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by ChimpMaster View Post
                      Whippy, which model is this and how much would it cost?
                      The model is UE55D6530 and around £1,500.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X