• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Buying a Mac

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I recently got a Mac too as a plaything really. Its great and mine DOES just work. Am i using it wrong?

    For any Windaz users thinking of taking the plunge - its very intuitive and not at all hard to pick up, i thought it'd be a nightmare at first.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Durbs View Post
      I recently got a Mac too as a plaything really. Its great and mine DOES just work. Am i using it wrong?

      For any Windaz users thinking of taking the plunge - its very intuitive and not at all hard to pick up, i thought it'd be a nightmare at first.
      No you are not 'using it wrong' it's just that you haven't done serious day-in day-out work on it.

      Enjoy your shiny toy

      You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
        No you are not 'using it wrong' it's just that you haven't done serious day-in day-out work on it.
        I'm not looking forward to having to code on the Mac... well Java will be fine since it has Eclipse but I am too set on Visual Studio for C++.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          I'm not looking forward to having to code on the Mac... well Java will be fine since it has Eclipse but I am too set on Visual Studio for C++.
          VMWare Fusion (http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/)

          I use VS lots - no problem.

          You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            I'm not looking forward to having to code on the Mac... well Java will be fine since it has Eclipse but I am too set on Visual Studio for C++.
            Yeah, i bought mine to use XCode and knock up a few iPhone apps and am a long time VS user. Totally different way of doing things!

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
              VMWare Fusion (http://www.vmware.com/download/fusion/)

              I use VS lots - no problem.
              Is running a virtual machine really usable? Is it really efficient or is it just that a modern processor is 10X more powerful than XP actually needs to run OK?
              Personally, dual-booting on a new Mac sounds preferable but I haven't tried any of these systems... a colleague runs SQL server on a MacBook Air using Parallels, but I'd be worried it would all bog down a lot.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                Is running a virtual machine really usable? Is it really efficient or is it just that a modern processor is 10X more powerful than XP actually needs to run OK?
                Personally, dual-booting on a new Mac sounds preferable but I haven't tried any of these systems... a colleague runs SQL server on a MacBook Air using Parallels, but I'd be worried it would all bog down a lot.
                You can run OSX 10.5 on something pretty old and decrepid.

                Runnning on a dual core machine, there's plenty of spare capacity to run XP.

                Like all VM solutions, parallels is configurable. I let it have about 0.5GB of memory and optimise for OSX performance - still good enough to do what I need to do (coding stuff & testing).
                ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
                  No you are not 'using it wrong' it's just that you haven't done serious day-in day-out work on it.

                  Enjoy your shiny toy
                  Yeah. My biggest Missing App: Textpad. Simple, but it and I have learned to get along so well.....

                  Next one along, when I get to it: a 16-bit/channel photo editor. Gimp is great for Photoshop-like manipulations, but it's only 8-bit/channel. That's not good enough for serious retouching of scans of old emulsion. Lightzone is superb for getting your photos done and dusted and out the door in no time (and looking better than you thought possible) and it is 16-bit/channel; but it doesn't quite have PS's retouching capabilities. I had been hoping to avoid buying PS for the Mac. Oh well.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    I'm buying a Mac at lunchtime.

                    A Big Mac.



                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by expat View Post
                      Yeah. My biggest Missing App: Textpad. Simple, but it and I have learned to get along so well.....

                      Next one along, when I get to it: a 16-bit/channel photo editor. Gimp is great for Photoshop-like manipulations, but it's only 8-bit/channel. That's not good enough for serious retouching of scans of old emulsion. Lightzone is superb for getting your photos done and dusted and out the door in no time (and looking better than you thought possible) and it is 16-bit/channel; but it doesn't quite have PS's retouching capabilities. I had been hoping to avoid buying PS for the Mac. Oh well.
                      Try Textmate.

                      I haven't ever had the need to use anything other than iPhoto for retouching, but I read good things about Aperture.
                      ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X