• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reasonable camera?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
    Cojak - trust me the Sony W300 is the one to get. It's £182 so yes a bit more expensive but at 13Mp it's future proofed for longer and has a heap of great features, while still being very easy to use.

    Apart from that, it looks great and the titanium body shivers me timbers!
    Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.

    That said, as a true contractor, you should only be considering a leica
    ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
      Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.
      WHS

      More pixels is by no means a guarantee of a better picture.
      Where are we going? And what’s with this hand basket?

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
        Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.

        That said, as a true contractor, you should only be considering a leica
        Which is what the Panasonic mentioned earlier is - a rebadged Leica for less money.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Clippy View Post
          Which is what the Panasonic mentioned earlier is - a rebadged Leica for less money.
          That reminds me of a tip I read on DPreview or similar a few years ago. The advice was to go for a manufacturer with long experience in quality lenses, and setting them up properly*. Leica definitely fits that bill.

          * just because a camera has a bought in top name lens doesn't mean the associated software is all that good
          Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

          Comment


            #15
            Carl Zeiss isn't a good lens?

            Comment


              #16
              My Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500 is fab.
              Easy to use or complicated if you want it to be!
              I have no complaints, and would recommend it.
              I'm sorry, but I'll make no apologies for this

              Pogle is awarded +5 Xeno Geek Points.
              CUK University Challenge Champions 2010
              CUK University Challenge Champions 2012

              Comment


                #17
                you hve a seprate camera? hahah

                i use the camera in my fone. all my m8s do.

                <admin note>No text speak please. No being offensive or aggressive either please. You come across as ignorant AND stupid, not a good combination.</admin note>
                Last edited by administrator; 5 December 2008, 09:13.

                Comment


                  #18
                  The Ricoh R7 always gets rave reviews, it was about £220 at launch but can be had for £115 now.

                  http://www.trustedreviews.com/digita...h-Caplio-R7/p1
                  Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Cojak - What did you go for in the end?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X