• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Reasonable camera?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Reasonable camera?"

Collapse

  • Clippy
    replied
    Cojak - What did you go for in the end?

    Leave a comment:


  • gingerjedi
    replied
    The Ricoh R7 always gets rave reviews, it was about £220 at launch but can be had for £115 now.

    http://www.trustedreviews.com/digita...h-Caplio-R7/p1

    Leave a comment:


  • javacoder
    replied
    you hve a seprate camera? hahah

    i use the camera in my fone. all my m8s do.

    <admin note>No text speak please. No being offensive or aggressive either please. You come across as ignorant AND stupid, not a good combination.</admin note>
    Last edited by administrator; 5 December 2008, 09:13.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    My Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX500 is fab.
    Easy to use or complicated if you want it to be!
    I have no complaints, and would recommend it.

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Carl Zeiss isn't a good lens?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post
    Which is what the Panasonic mentioned earlier is - a rebadged Leica for less money.
    That reminds me of a tip I read on DPreview or similar a few years ago. The advice was to go for a manufacturer with long experience in quality lenses, and setting them up properly*. Leica definitely fits that bill.

    * just because a camera has a bought in top name lens doesn't mean the associated software is all that good

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.

    That said, as a true contractor, you should only be considering a leica
    Which is what the Panasonic mentioned earlier is - a rebadged Leica for less money.

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.
    WHS

    More pixels is by no means a guarantee of a better picture.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by TazMaN View Post
    Cojak - trust me the Sony W300 is the one to get. It's £182 so yes a bit more expensive but at 13Mp it's future proofed for longer and has a heap of great features, while still being very easy to use.

    Apart from that, it looks great and the titanium body shivers me timbers!
    Don't get sucked in to thinking 13MP on a tiny sensor is a good thing. You'll end up with grainy pics in anything other than perfect light. Better to go for something smaller MP, but better quality lens and processing.

    That said, as a true contractor, you should only be considering a leica

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    hmmm... tempted then Taz...

    Leave a comment:


  • ChimpMaster
    replied
    Cojak - trust me the Sony W300 is the one to get. It's £182 so yes a bit more expensive but at 13Mp it's future proofed for longer and has a heap of great features, while still being very easy to use.

    Apart from that, it looks great and the titanium body shivers me timbers!

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    I bought a Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX33 in the spring for £130 which is a great camera.

    It was quickly superseded by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX35 but I wasn't fussed as the big price difference at the time didn't warrant the few additional features.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    DP Review said that it was better the Fuji tested, which surprised them as Fuji is usually excellent...

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by cojak View Post
    Ta VF - did that and they came up with this little beauty - perfect!
    I've heard Sonys are not good in low light conditions.

    Don't know if this is true for all their cameras.
    Last edited by Clippy; 28 November 2008, 12:33. Reason: Cos I felt like it!

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Ta VF - did that and they came up with this little beauty - perfect!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X