Sorted now mods please delete
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Update In Oracle Question
Collapse
X
-
Update In Oracle Question
-
We no how do Sorted delete mods in Oracle.Originally posted by MobileCheeseSorted now mods please delete
Very quick us software engineer do Oracle cheap.I do all codes.
Much Quickness - Plenty Cheapness.
New most excellent Blogger: http://shawadiwadi.blogspot.com/
New YouTube Channel: BobShawadiwadi -
Seriously, isn't that a little self-centred? Please leave the question here, and post the solution too. That is how Usenet and Bulletin Boards became a reserve of knowledge.Originally posted by MobileCheeseSorted now mods please delete
Not to be too rude, but deleting the question because you have the answer is a little like those who post a question and add "please reply by e-mail because I rarely read these discussions". If you use it, contribute too; they also contribute who ask, as well as who answer.Comment
-
I deleted the post because it was relatively stupied question and I got the answer somewhere else, I also thought after CUK wasnt a good place to post it.
If you interested though, I was questioning what the correct behaviour for the following UPDATE statement was,
UPDATE TABLE1 a
SET a.JOB = (select b.job from temp b where a.id = b.id)
I assumed it would only update where the join condition of a.id = b.id was met but it appears not. Anything that didnt meet that condition was updated to NULL anything that did meet that condition was updated to the value in the temp table. It was late on Friday and I wasnt sure if that was the correct behaviour or somewhere along the line I hadnt been commiting my changes.
Anyway the answer was it was correctly nulling stuff where the join conidtion wasnt meet. To fix this I need to add a WHERE statement witn EXSITS IN.
The END 'Test Post Please'
Thanks
Last edited by MobileCheese; 7 January 2007, 17:20.Comment
-
Nothing to add really. Just fancied getting the last post in every section sad boy award.I'm Spartacus.Comment
-
He he....
Was trying to find a post to post in to get the same. Was going to post in the Exporting JDA somesuch or other and though "nah, looks too technical" so went for this thread and sparticus beat me to it.... moff to LR!Comment
-
Thanks for re-posting. Of course, it was elementary, not stupidOriginally posted by MobileCheeseI deleted the post because it was relatively stupid question and I got the answer somewhere else, I also thought after CUK wasnt a good place to post it.
It's a mistake that I've made too: maybe your post will save someone else from making it.
You may well be right that CUK is not the place to post serious questions, nor to remove what you think is stupid.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Comment