• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Dumb and Dumber 3

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Dumb and Dumber 3

    I built a new system (haven't spec'd and built one in about 20 years).

    AMD FX 9590
    32GB Ram
    Sabretooth FX990 R2.0 Mobo.
    500W PSU
    Zalman CSP990 MAX (CPU Cooler).

    I installed Centos7, and then KVM and chucked a few VMs on.

    It kept locking up after a while, like an overheat.

    I took it to my local PC repair shop who said to take Linux off, put windows on, install the correct drivers and temp monitors and then give it a stress test.

    So I did this. The first stress test pushed the CPU Temp up to 61 degrees, before there was a very loud bang, blue flash and a firework show

    I think I somewhat underated the PSU

    It looks like I got away with it, have ordered a new PSU (1000W).

    The PC repair bloke reckons the fan should hold the CPU, and so do the manufacturer. But 61 degress (and rising steadily before the fireworks).

    Anyone here know what they are doing and can give me a few pointers?
    Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

    #2
    It really depends on the PSU brand, most cheap PSUs marked as 500W will hardly be able to deliver 400W but even then it should be enough for that spec, the caveat here is that the advertised wattage is spread across all voltages 3.3, 5, 12v and the CPU and the GPU are hogging almost exclusively 12v. So for instance if your PSU is only outputting 15Ax12v=180W on the 12v rail the CPU alone will kill it. check the PSU lable and see how many amps are on the 12V rail.

    You didn't mention what GPU you are using.

    The easiest way to establish if the PSU is the culprit is to take it to the PC shop and have them hook it to 1000W PSU and tests.

    61c is rather hot, even for stupid AMD, but it shouldn't be an issue, should be able to run at 80+. No idea who suggested to you AMD CPU over Intel, their only selling point is price which might be very well negated in by the much higher power consumption over long run.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by sal View Post
      It really depends on the PSU brand, most cheap PSUs marked as 500W will hardly be able to deliver 400W but even then it should be enough for that spec, the caveat here is that the advertised wattage is spread across all voltages 3.3, 5, 12v and the CPU and the GPU are hogging almost exclusively 12v. So for instance if your PSU is only outputting 15Ax12v=180W on the 12v rail the CPU alone will kill it. check the PSU lable and see how many amps are on the 12V rail.

      You didn't mention what GPU you are using.

      The easiest way to establish if the PSU is the culprit is to take it to the PC shop and have them hook it to 1000W PSU and tests.

      61c is rather hot, even for stupid AMD, but it shouldn't be an issue, should be able to run at 80+. No idea who suggested to you AMD CPU over Intel, their only selling point is price which might be very well negated in by the much higher power consumption over long run.
      Please sir, it was Eek.

      The CPU apparently consumes 220W when running at full chat. Then add in the mobo, cheap as chips GPU (ASUS 1 GB GeForce 210 EN210 Silent PCIe Graphics Card), and the 6 fans, 2HDDs and it starts racking up. Apparently to more than 500W

      This link is what makes me think I need such a large PSU, and may need to update to a liquid cooler PSU and Cooling for my CPU AMD FX-9590 [Solved] - Power Supplies - Components

      That said, if you look at the specs of the existing cooler ::: Zalman, leading the world of Quiet Computing Solutions :::

      supports all speeds for this chip. Consider then it achieving 61 degrees when it was clocked down to 4GHz from 4.7.
      Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

      Comment


        #4
        Not me. Only computers in my house are macs and a Xeon based file server that no longer running VMs (they run on a box in the states now)...
        merely at clientco for the entertainment

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by eek View Post
          Not me. Only computers in my house are macs and a Xeon based file server that no longer running VMs (they run on a box in the states now)...
          'Twas.

          HTH
          Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

          Comment


            #6
            Dumb and Dumber 3

            Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
            'Twas.

            HTH
            It's for a server that's on all the time. Why would you use a chip that consumes 200 watts more than intel's equivalent?

            That is going to cost you (5kw/h) or 50p a day more for no benefit beyond heating your server room / garage
            merely at clientco for the entertainment

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by eek View Post
              It's for a server that's on all the time. Why would you use a chip that consumes 200 watts more than intel's equivalent?

              That is going to cost you (5kw/h) or 50p a day more for no benefit beyond heating your server room / garage
              Intel's equivalent actually consumes -20W?
              Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
                Intel's equivalent actually consumes -20W?
                No but they consume 45-80w instead of 220w...

                Also they have built in video so that's another 30watts saved.

                So yes you could save 200watts by buying an intel processor instead of an AMD radiator....
                merely at clientco for the entertainment

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by eek View Post
                  No but they consume 45-80w instead of 220w...

                  Also they have built in video so that's another 30watts saved.

                  So yes you could save 200watts by buying an intel processor instead of an AMD radiator....
                  Intel processors have built in Video?

                  220W - 80W = 200W
                  Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Not all rated PSUs are the same, you tend to get what you pay for so even a cheapo 1000w psu might be next to useless in real world tests

                    PSUs and mobos tend to be areas people skimp on thinking that don't really matter
                    Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

                    No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X