Originally posted by sophia57
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Really dont understand payslip
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Really dont understand payslip"
Collapse
-
Why did you think that your take home pay would be more? Your umbrella company should be paying you via PAYE so your earnings are subject to income tax and employee's NIC's plus your umbrella company will have had to pay employer's NIC's and they will have retained a margin from the contract value. This should have been explained/detailed on their website/an explanation provided with the payslip
-
Sounds about rightOriginally posted by SpontaneousOrder View PostHow much would you expect to retain? 'more' is pretty vague.
£500 - 200 expenses = 300.
300 - tax etc = 211.
211 + 200 expenses = 411.
So you retained over 70% ignoring expenses, and retained about 82% when you include expenses?
Leave a comment:
-
How much would you expect to retain? 'more' is pretty vague.
£500 - 200 expenses = 300.
300 - tax etc = 211.
211 + 200 expenses = 411.
So you retained over 70% ignoring expenses, and retained about 82% when you include expenses?
Leave a comment:
-
Hi, thanks for your reply. No my expenses have been for 2 weeks so I submitted 2 weeks worth of expenses. But I only received 2 days pay as my agency pays 2 weeks in arrears. Yeah I received the £211 and also got £200 back tax free. Is that right? I thought that out of the £500 I'd get more?Originally posted by TheCyclingProgrammer View PostThat doesn't seem right, unless they've deducted your expenses but not paid them to you yet. You should have received the £200 tax free, then from the remainder you would have had deducted the umbrella fee, employee and employer NIC and income tax but I would have imagined you should have had at least £350 from the £500.
£200 seems high for two days, did you have an overnight stay?
Leave a comment:
-
That doesn't seem right, unless they've deducted your expenses but not paid them to you yet. You should have received the £200 tax free, then from the remainder you would have had deducted the umbrella fee, employee and employer NIC and income tax but I would have imagined you should have had at least £350 from the £500.
£200 seems high for two days, did you have an overnight stay?
Leave a comment:
-
-
Really dont understand payslip
Hello,
Hoping someone can shed some light on why I am receiving so little from my contract. My rate is 250 per day. For two days work I received only £211.44 out of £500....? How is this right? I also had claimed expenses of £200 pounds. Am I better off not claiming expenses, would I have received more then? Very confused
Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Leave a comment: