• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Adobe kills Flash on mobiles"

Collapse

  • VectraMan
    replied
    HTML5 won't be a standard for a couple of years yet, and even then the issue of video remains undefined. Even then, no doubt the browser writers will still be knocking out proprietary features, and then waiting for the standards bodies to catch up. Whatever you think of Flash, it's probably the only technology that's come closest to the write once run anywhere goal, precisely because it's one company that's developed it.

    As for Javascript, Macromedia added proper classes and type checking to Javascript, but in a clever way that allowed it to remain backwards compatible and keep the advantages of dynamic types. The standards people based ECMAScript 4 on the same thing, and for a while things looked really good: a proper modern secure object-oriented language to rival Java or C#, but built into the browser. But then they rejected the whole thing and decided that Javascript should be a language with little more technical sophistication than ZX BASIC.

    All this could turn out to be a case of "be careful what you wish for".

    And Adobe haven't killed Flash on mobiles. They've said they're not going to develop it further, and as further development of Flash is towards high-end gaming, that's not surprising. Flash as it is will continue to work, and continue to be supported on everything that does it now, and presumably as the technology exists for Android and Windows Mobile, new devices will continue to support it too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    Did anyone else get into Flash update hell yesterday or today?

    One XP system here kept downloading the blighter and failing to install, even though according to the Control Panel it had the latest one already installed.

    The sooner it dies the better, and if it weren't for YouTube I'd be quite happy without it.

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    A question - is HTML5 in active development or is it a fixed set of things? Flash/SL have always been under continual development, whereas JS hasn't changed for ages (?) and if HTML5 is a fixed spec, isn't that going to limit progress? After all even C++ and Java evolve...
    HTML5 is constantly evolving; the WHAT-WG branch of the development effort no longer even call it 5, having deemed that it will just keep on evolving for ever, or something.

    JavaScript has developed a lot; even Microsoft are involved in that. IE9 incorporates a lot of stuff from ECMAScript 5 (which is the official name, "JavaScript" being a trademark of Sun Microsystems and therefore now of Oracle, which was licensed to Netscape, and via that route to Mozilla). ECMAScript 5 compatibility table gives a lot of details.

    JS has also evolved in terms of the techniques used by implementations, with a variety of approaches being used to provide JITted execution without sacrificing the dynamic nature of the language; hence constant benchmark battles between the different vendors. This IE team blog post is fairly typical: The New JavaScript Engine in Internet Explorer 9; a little Googling will quickly find similar posts from the Apple, Google, Opera, and Mozilla browser dev teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    Yeah but HTML4 was around for what, a decade?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    According to the HTML5 Wiki entry it is still under active development, but just as it was preceded by versions 1 to 4, HTML5 will probably not be the end of the line.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    A question - is HTML5 in active development or is it a fixed set of things? Flash/SL have always been under continual development, whereas JS hasn't changed for ages (?) and if HTML5 is a fixed spec, isn't that going to limit progress? After all even C++ and Java evolve...

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    As a follow on, teh future of Silverlight?

    Will there be a Silverlight 6 (and does it matter)?

    Microsoft is poised to release to manufacturing Silverlight 5. There’s word from some of my contacts that this might be the last major release of Silverlight, but Microsoft isn’t confirming or denying.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    KUATB - ScooterScot beat me to it in General.

    Still, Technical is a better place for this, since I believe some folks here have an investment in it.
    Last edited by Sysman; 10 November 2011, 10:31. Reason: Spacecadet beat me to my KUATB

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...ast-laugh.html

    I would add KUATB but this is a technical topic and you had the grace to post in the technical forum!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    started a topic Adobe kills Flash on mobiles

    Adobe kills Flash on mobiles

    Who'd a thunk it given their replies to Apple's criticisms?

    Exclusive: Adobe ceases development on mobile browser Flash, refocuses efforts on HTML5

    Update From the horse's mouth

Working...
X