Reply to: Code Puzzle2

[d000hg]

AtW

It was easy victory since both Churchill and NickFits are my sockies

If Churchill is your sockpuppet then you have serious self-loathing issues.

[Churchill]

AtW

It wasn't a competition I misunderstood the requirements.

FTFY.

[AtW]

Congrats on both your technical and moral victory Atw!

AtW

It was easy victory since both Churchill and NickFits are my sockies

[d000hg]

It's a little sad to see anyone made to look silly by AtW. Nearly as embarrassing as being made to look an idiot by DimPrawn.

Congrats on both your technical and moral victory Atw!

[lightng]

Is this a pay-per-view event? If so, I may need to borrow some popcorn from DP.

Still, if I need my alarm system (circa 1982) re-programming, at least I know where to come.

[AtW]

It was your personal insults I objected to. So, less than 50 bytes or you'll leave the forum, this should be good.

So it's 42 bytes code and I am not leaving forum

[d000hg]

AtW the armchair warrior strikes again

That's rich.

[AtW]

AtW the armchair warrior strikes again

That was after you called me "twat" in the same thread.

Then you deleted all source code at start of the thread and run away.

So I called you a bit of a coward. Is that a personal insult? Maybe, but you sure are in no position to claim insulted innocence here - you started it well early whilst I was trying to be constructive.

[Churchill]

Ok, I've missed that then. Link?

For an ex-Royal Marine you are a bit of a coward - run away you big girls blouse!

AtW the armchair warrior strikes again

[AtW]

Ok, I've missed that then. Link?

Read from top here: http://forums.contractoruk.com/techn...de-puzzle.html

Post #8 is:

Nope, I thought I'd have a go at posting something that some people may enjoy playing with hence the title of the post.

AtW decided to be a twat and spoil it.

That's his first of the many rude words that he used in that thread.

So, let's say I insulted him before that, this means my "insults" must have been in the following posts in the same thread:

I'll give you just one hint (free of charge):

---------
inc di
inc di
dec cx
---------

is better be:

---------
inc di
dec cx
inc di
---------

And another one:

je 137
jmp 11E
^^^^^^^

Making absolute jumps to predefined addresses and asking people to change source code that would inevitably change offsets is rather mean.

And FFS stop programming in 16-bit DOS mode - time to move on!

OR

Recalculating manually absolute addresses is not exercise for brains - maybe only to weed out those who would actually cave in to this task and accept it as norm, a bit like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7ebfrcv4tc

Your code is sure very poor performance wise, maybe intentionally but in any case when you ask people to optimise assembly you need to say which CPU you are targeting.

OR

btw, no debug command on Win XP 64 bit

Which one of the 3 personally insulted Churchy? I'd say #2 probably - I reckon he realised that he looked like those retards during interview in Men in Black where as I was like Will Smith who pulled the table to write - keep using "debug" Churchy

[oracleslave]

Sick of being personally insulted by AtW - possibly.

Ok, I've missed that then. Link?

[AtW]

Sick of being personally insulted by AtW - possibly.

Which of my words exactly personally insulted you?

I hope not the ones related to your professional assembly skills - posting tulip of a code that did not run and making people use DEBUG to execute it - not even I did that 20 years back when I first started programming

[AtW]

you're just a f**king foreign retard!

[Churchill]

And you're claiming the moral highground after allegedly being insulted?

Are you drunk?

Moral high ground? Not at all. Drunk? No.

Sick of being personally insulted by AtW - possibly.

[d000hg]

He's a real man. Hit them till they can't disagree.