I don't mind how people talk as long as we understand each other and we are polite avoiding unnecessary swearing.
When it comes to reading business related documents I would expect to see some minimum standards - to me "updations" does not meet that minimum standard, however if it becomes widespread through general use in this country that even the Telegraph / Times / FT use it then I guess I should accept it has become the norm.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Insertions, deletions and updations
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Insertions, deletions and updations"
Collapse
-
I have some sympathy with Ardesco on on this one. I've just watched "New Tricks" on Telly - it was a repeat from a while ago. A lot of the action takes place in court. There are several points at which a brief calls out "objection!" to which the judge responds "sustained" or "overruled". Anyone with the most cursory knowledge of UK courts knows this just doesn't happen here. Plainly the writers are either too immersed in US culture to know the difference or else they are trying to sell to the US. Why can't we celebrate our differences from the Septics whilst having mutual respect?
I hear loads of people using "gotten" on a regular basis, and it grates - of course no one gives a tulip what I think, but that doesn't stop me having an opinion. I like the Septics (mostly), but I don't wish to act or speak like one.
And it wouldn't be so bad if they didn't make the Brit a weasly cowardly villain any time he's allowed to speak in his own accent.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dandcg View PostWhat about Upserts...
Dan
Don't know why you're asking about it in this thread though, should be in LR
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dang65 View PostHeard another one yesterday. Some suit on the phone to the office the second we got off the plane:
"Blah blah blah... Yeah, we'll need global resources to solution this."
Presumably not familiar with the verb "to solve".
Leave a comment:
-
Heard another one yesterday. Some suit on the phone to the office the second we got off the plane:
"Blah blah blah... Yeah, we'll need global resources to solution this."
Presumably not familiar with the verb "to solve".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ardesco View PostI disagree completely. We already have one bastardised version of English (American English) out there and we do not need another!
English will evolve as time moves forward, but resisting made up words brought into the language by people who do not speak the language and bastardise it to make it easier for them is the right thing to do.
Our language is part of our national identity and we should be protecting it rather than pandering to various people who cannot be bothered to learn it correctly. I would not expect to go to a country that speaks another language and then bastardise it to make it easier for me and then expect them to conform, I would expect to be treated with contempt and derision and as far as I'm concerned this is how we should treat people that try to bring in words like updation, needful and blatant inaccuracies like "coz".
I have picked up somebody on the use of "coz" in a document before and they were surprised to find out it wasn't a real word, they had heard it said so often they thought it was the correct spelling and were quite mortified when it was explained that it did not exist. Said person no longer uses it in documents now that they know that they should really be writing because and as a result they have learnt something about our language and thier documents look a damn sight more professional.
I would suggest that people who do not care how words are spelt or grammar is presented are likely to be people who fall into one of three categories:
- Not native English speakers
- Not well educated
- Not well read
The last being the most likely, as people who are not well read have not learned to appreciate the various intricacies of well written English, and are therefore unlikely to be able to derive pleasure from well formed prose.
Wheeling out "the English language is always evolving" as an argument is feeble justification for the corruption of our mother toungue at best and a lazy trollish answer provided by somebody who cannot be bother to form a coherent argument at worst....
fixed those for you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dang65 View Post"Stiff upper lip" originated in America, by-the-way so kindly desist from using it in future.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: