• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Insertions, deletions and updations"

Collapse

  • MPwannadecentincome
    replied
    I don't mind how people talk as long as we understand each other and we are polite avoiding unnecessary swearing.

    When it comes to reading business related documents I would expect to see some minimum standards - to me "updations" does not meet that minimum standard, however if it becomes widespread through general use in this country that even the Telegraph / Times / FT use it then I guess I should accept it has become the norm.

    Leave a comment:


  • DS23
    replied
    not the thread i wa looking for but glad i found it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    I have some sympathy with Ardesco on on this one. I've just watched "New Tricks" on Telly - it was a repeat from a while ago. A lot of the action takes place in court. There are several points at which a brief calls out "objection!" to which the judge responds "sustained" or "overruled". Anyone with the most cursory knowledge of UK courts knows this just doesn't happen here. Plainly the writers are either too immersed in US culture to know the difference or else they are trying to sell to the US. Why can't we celebrate our differences from the Septics whilst having mutual respect?

    I hear loads of people using "gotten" on a regular basis, and it grates - of course no one gives a tulip what I think, but that doesn't stop me having an opinion. I like the Septics (mostly), but I don't wish to act or speak like one.

    And it wouldn't be so bad if they didn't make the Brit a weasly cowardly villain any time he's allowed to speak in his own accent.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pogle
    replied
    I just call them deltas

    Leave a comment:


  • ribble
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    There's specialist websites about upskirts, the japanese appear to be particularly keen.

    Don't know why you're asking about it in this thread though, should be in LR
    Specialist....

    Leave a comment:


  • dang65
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    To management, "providing a solution" and "solving a problem" are not necessarily related concepts
    Word.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by dandcg View Post
    What about Upserts...

    Dan
    There's specialist websites about upskirts, the japanese appear to be particularly keen.

    Don't know why you're asking about it in this thread though, should be in LR

    Leave a comment:


  • ribble
    replied
    What about Upserts...

    Dan

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    To management, "providing a solution" and "solving a problem" are not necessarily related concepts
    tulip. Another keyboard bits the dust.....

    Leave a comment:


  • NickFitz
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    Heard another one yesterday. Some suit on the phone to the office the second we got off the plane:

    "Blah blah blah... Yeah, we'll need global resources to solution this."

    Presumably not familiar with the verb "to solve".
    To management, "providing a solution" and "solving a problem" are not necessarily related concepts

    Leave a comment:


  • dang65
    replied
    Heard another one yesterday. Some suit on the phone to the office the second we got off the plane:

    "Blah blah blah... Yeah, we'll need global resources to solution this."

    Presumably not familiar with the verb "to solve".

    Leave a comment:


  • adestor
    replied
    Originally posted by OrangeHopper View Post
    What is to say the queen hasn't outsourced her database updates.
    Updations.

    And nobody mentioned selectations

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    ...only the most anally retentive actually give a toss.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
    I disagree completely. We already have one bastardised version of English (American English) out there and we do not need another!

    English will evolve as time moves forward, but resisting made up words brought into the language by people who do not speak the language and bastardise it to make it easier for them is the right thing to do.

    Our language is part of our national identity and we should be protecting it rather than pandering to various people who cannot be bothered to learn it correctly. I would not expect to go to a country that speaks another language and then bastardise it to make it easier for me and then expect them to conform, I would expect to be treated with contempt and derision and as far as I'm concerned this is how we should treat people that try to bring in words like updation, needful and blatant inaccuracies like "coz".

    I have picked up somebody on the use of "coz" in a document before and they were surprised to find out it wasn't a real word, they had heard it said so often they thought it was the correct spelling and were quite mortified when it was explained that it did not exist. Said person no longer uses it in documents now that they know that they should really be writing because and as a result they have learnt something about our language and thier documents look a damn sight more professional.

    I would suggest that people who do not care how words are spelt or grammar is presented are likely to be people who fall into one of three categories:
    • Not native English speakers
    • Not well educated
    • Not well read

    The last being the most likely, as people who are not well read have not learned to appreciate the various intricacies of well written English, and are therefore unlikely to be able to derive pleasure from well formed prose.

    Wheeling out "the English language is always evolving" as an argument is feeble justification for the corruption of our mother toungue at best and a lazy trollish answer provided by somebody who cannot be bother to form a coherent argument at worst....


    fixed those for you

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    "Stiff upper lip" originated in America, by-the-way so kindly desist from using it in future.
    What about "innit", innit?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X