• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "VOIP SIP best codec for outgoing voice"

Collapse

  • bored
    replied
    Originally posted by NoddY
    Skype is a peer-to-peer system and will use a series of clever tricks to circumvent firewalls and to deal with NAT, such as tunnelling via HTTP and STUN. A 'local' group of Skype users establish a mesh, a few of which become 'supernodes'. All this carry-on is transparent to the end user. In other words, it's very difficult to pinpoint bottlenecks.
    One of their "clever tricks" is to quietly take over port 80 without asking the user Took me quite a while to figure out why the app server on a demo machine would sometimes stop working after a reboot ...

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    [QUOTE=Fishface]
    Originally posted by NoddY
    A 'local' group of Skype users establish a mesh, a few of which become 'supernodes'.

    QUOTE]

    You mean each Skype user is carrying other peoples calls through the skype on their computer? thus the deterioration of quality? buzz on the line etc

    Hmmmn wonder how many...

    It's likely that low latency nodes, especially un-NATted ones, without restrictions on UDP traffic and significant uptime, would be elevated in the Skype hierarchy. Therefore such nodes are likely to carry multiple conversations, or assist in the setting up of other people's calls. Encryption prevents eavesdropping.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fishface
    replied
    [QUOTE=NoddY] A 'local' group of Skype users establish a mesh, a few of which become 'supernodes'.

    QUOTE]

    You mean each Skype user is carrying other peoples calls through the skype on their computer? thus the deterioration of quality? buzz on the line etc

    Hmmmn wonder how many...

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by NoddY
    Skype is very complex. Nobody knows what codec(s) Skype are using because it's proprietary and I believe it dynamically adjusts its codecs per call!

    Skype is a peer-to-peer system and will use a series of clever tricks to circumvent firewalls and to deal with NAT, such as tunnelling via HTTP and STUN. A 'local' group of Skype users establish a mesh, a few of which become 'supernodes'. All this carry-on is transparent to the end user. In other words, it's very difficult to pinpoint bottlenecks.

    I recommend sticking to SIP/RTP [or IAX2 which is firewall and bandwidth friendly].
    That's what RTCP is for...

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Originally posted by Fishface
    ...Any idea what codec Skype uses? - I have noticed a deterioration of their service for some time now - cant find their advanced settings.
    Skype is very complex. Nobody knows what codec(s) Skype are using because it's proprietary and I believe it dynamically adjusts its codecs per call!

    Skype is a peer-to-peer system and will use a series of clever tricks to circumvent firewalls and to deal with NAT, such as tunnelling via HTTP and STUN. A 'local' group of Skype users establish a mesh, a few of which become 'supernodes'. All this carry-on is transparent to the end user. In other words, it's very difficult to pinpoint bottlenecks.

    I recommend sticking to SIP/RTP [or IAX2 which is firewall and bandwidth friendly].

    Leave a comment:


  • Fishface
    replied
    Ta Noddy - done the change - no more complaints yet.

    I am using a Draytek Vigor 2800vg - excellent - got the telephone plug ot a decent normal phone using a SIP service.

    Those IP phones are gy-nor-mouse - they have a look of Sugar's Daftphone

    Any idea what codec Skype uses? - I have noticed a deterioration of their service for some time now - cant find their advanced settings.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    g711 aLaw

    see http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/ITU+G.711

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    Get a proper phone.

    I'm using the Linksys SPA941 - much better sound quality than a microphone.

    I use a headset from it if I need hands free.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fishface
    started a topic VOIP SIP best codec for outgoing voice

    VOIP SIP best codec for outgoing voice

    Hello,

    does anyone know the best codec to use for SIP/VOIP for outgoing voice?

    I can hear people perfectly - the other side complains that they hear me quietly.

    And the microphone is working and placed correctly.

    Any tips on how to improve the outgoing voice quality?
Working...
X