Smart TV or ChromeCast?

[MonkeysUncle]

Got an LG Smart TV. Personally I dont think the 'smart' options are worth it at all. Other than Netflix havent used a single other feature (games/other streaming services)
I am going to get a CC.
The WiFi on the LG was tulip, was getting 0.5mbps down on Netflix when the router was literally 2 feet away. Had to connect it via LAN cable to get a decent speed.

Main reason for the CC is I cant mirror from my Pixel to the TV without it. More an issue with the Pixel than the TV tbh.

[sal]

get yourself a smart tv with wifi enabled + usb transmitter/receiver + kodi showbox etc

This makes no sense, why would you need smart TV if you are going for a kodi box and what is a usb transmitter/receiver?

[cporter]

get yourself a smart tv with wifi enabled + usb transmitter/receiver + kodi showbox etc

[Fred Bloggs]

Because as a side effect of the fragmented Android HW market Apps tend to be backward compatible for several generation of the OS and are usually designed to work OK on under-powered HW, like the one found in most cheap set-top-boxes. Amazon fire stick/TV are essentially running Android.

Also you are more or less guaranteed to have an app available for the service you want to use, unlike the TV OSes where developers sometimes cba supporting the app for long even if they decide to make one in the first place.

Couldn't have put it better. Mrs Bloggs bought a Samsung 4k smart TV. I wanted her to buy a Sony android TV. For the reasons above. But I now have a Chromecast plugged into it so we are both content.

[sal]

I did actually see one though it was either top-end of the price range I looked at, or 720p. I don't know much about Android SmartTVs, how/why are they better? I know you can also get Android dongle-things like CC/Fire but again I hadn't really considered them.

Because as a side effect of the fragmented Android HW market Apps tend to be backward compatible for several generation of the OS and are usually designed to work OK on under-powered HW, like the one found in most cheap set-top-boxes. Amazon fire stick/TV are essentially running Android.

Also you are more or less guaranteed to have an app available for the service you want to use, unlike the TV OSes where developers sometimes cba supporting the app for long even if they decide to make one in the first place.

[d000hg]

Dumb TV + Smart thingie of your choosing beats any "Smart"TV. The only "Smart" TVs worth considering are the ones running AndroidTV for OS, like some Sony models. All of the TV brand OSes are pigtulip and kill updates for older models after 1-2 years.

I was chuffed to get our main TV replaced with a Lg 4K smart one, that we finally didn't need to use the PS3 for Netflix... it runs WebOS3 and while the interface is actually very nice (Fire is so ugly) there's seemingly a bug with Netflix+surround sound+WebOS where it flicks out every now and then. I was thinking my new surround system was faulty and wondering how to prove it when I found others complaining.

[d000hg]

Could consider an android os smart TV? Unlikely to be a budget option though.

I did actually see one though it was either top-end of the price range I looked at, or 720p. I don't know much about Android SmartTVs, how/why are they better? I know you can also get Android dongle-things like CC/Fire but again I hadn't really considered them.

[Fred Bloggs]

Could consider an android os smart TV? Unlikely to be a budget option though.

[sal]

Dumb TV + Smart thingie of your choosing beats any "Smart"TV. The only "Smart" TVs worth considering are the ones running AndroidTV for OS, like some Sony models. All of the TV brand OSes are pigtulip and kill updates for older models after 1-2 years.

Personally I prefer Fire stick over chrome cast, because of the dedicated remote and actually having an OS, where to use Chromecast you need one more device to juggle with in order to play something.

If you are in the Apple ecosystem, Apple TV wins hands down for main TV, but probably too pricey for secondary screens like in your case.

If you are Apple averse, but want something full featured, take a look at NVIDA Shield, it runs Android TV and has better HW than Apple TV at the same price point.

[stek]

Apple TV, I’ve a Smart tv, with an Amazon Fire HD too, Apple TV blows the socks off both, fluid menus, fast interface, no lag, Fire HD is sluggish, Smart tv even worse...

[Unix]

Non smart TV and Firestick, TV companies software is tulip. You can alway upgrade the firestick or Chormecast without paying and arm and a leg.

[d000hg]

I want to get a fairly budget-y TV for my office (maybe another for the gym). 24-32" - ideally 28" though this is less common. I think I want to require full HD just for more future flexibility - it's fine for live TV which is the main use-case (news & sport while at work) but full HD means I can use it as a monitor if needed.

You pay a premium for Smart TVs and I'm not sure I would want it, but again it's handy to have the option. If the difference in price between equivalent HD / Smart HD TVs is about the same as the cost of a ChromeCast, what would your preference be?

My concern over Smart TVs is the OS is unknown, app updates may not happen, etc - whereas CC has Google backing. I already have both ChromeCast and Fire Stick in my house so could go either way... I find the Amazon interface annoying and it costs a tenner more, but it has a dedicated remote rather than having to dick about tossing things at the screen.