• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Wireless interference"

Collapse

  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco
    And I was abused for cutting holes in all my walls and running CAT5E through the whole house so that every room has at least 2 network ports....



    You'll see in the end, i'll have my nice gigabit network running while you are all loosing your wireless link and i'll be laughing all the way to the .. erm .. Internet.

    (and yes I know you are supposed to use CAT6 for gigabit, but i'm sure i'll still get gigabit speeds from the shielded CAT5E cable i used )
    Depends on the distance really, but you would most likely be affected. But I doubt you'll be running anything that needs gigabit anyway for a very long time.

    Good idea all the same, the powerline adapters work well enough for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    And I was abused for cutting holes in all my walls and running CAT5E through the whole house so that every room has at least 2 network ports....



    You'll see in the end, i'll have my nice gigabit network running while you are all loosing your wireless link and i'll be laughing all the way to the .. erm .. Internet.

    (and yes I know you are supposed to use CAT6 for gigabit, but i'm sure i'll still get gigabit speeds from the shielded CAT5E cable i used )

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Also - thought about using your power to carry your ethernet?

    http://www.netgear.com/Products/Powe...ome+Networking

    I use these at home to hook up some non wireless kit I have in my loft, work a treat.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    I wouldn't buy netgear again. What's the use of a wireless network if it doesn't even cover an average detached house?

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    I had the same issue recently - there's are probably a bucketload more people using wireless in your area than you realise, and being in the same channel will caus you problems.

    Use a tool like netstumbler to pick up all the traffic, leave it on for a wee bit to monitor (You unbind TCP from your wireless card) what's being used and pick a channel that isn't.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ivor1
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by where did my id go?
    Those remote tv thingies (tv eye?) can cause problems.

    The ones that people use to transmit sky to another tv. they use a similar frequency band. Changing channel usually sorts that.
    I used to have one of those setup as well actually. The TV thingy never seemed to interfere with WiFi, but the WiFi would cause interference on the TV no matter what I did with the channel selections. So in the end I had to unplug the router whenever I used the TV thingy.

    I used it to link TV Out from my PC upstairs to the TV downstairs.

    Leave a comment:


  • where did my id go?
    replied
    Those remote tv thingies (tv eye?) can cause problems.

    The ones that people use to transmit sky to another tv. they use a similar frequency band. Changing channel usually sorts that.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    Yeah they all have a firewall.

    Leave a comment:


  • cojak
    replied
    I like the look of the linksys router (wired) but can't see if it includes a firewall - have I missed it?

    That's why I bought a Zoom router.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    Originally posted by VectraMan
    Without wanting to get too technical, it's grey.

    It's worked for 3 years.
    Grey / white. Same colour - different shade!

    If it's worked 3 years then get the hammer out and start hitting it.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Without wanting to get too technical, it's grey.

    It's worked for 3 years.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMonkey
    replied
    If it's one of those white netgear ones, I've had no end of trouble with them including problems like the one you describe. I moved to Linksys kit and it's all nice now.

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    started a topic Wireless interference

    Wireless interference

    I have a desktop, and laptop, and downstairs a Netgear ADSL wireless router. For a few days the desktop has been slow on some websites, and pinging the router would lose packets or have a high return time (>100ms).

    This morning it wouldn't work at all. The wierd thing is that it would pick up the available connection with excellent signal quality and no errors, yet wouldn't connect to it. I tried rebooting the router, but that made no difference.

    The laptop had no problem with websites, but doing a large download I seemed to be getting narrowband speeds.

    In desperation, I changed the wireless channel on the router and now it all works perfectly again.

    So my question is: if something is interfering (like one of my neighbours running wireless), would that not be indicated with a poor quality signal? How can it say "excellent" with no errors and good SNR and yet not connect on that channel but be able to work on a different channel? Or is the software just lying to me?
Working...
X