Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
If anyone is still interested, and have a single very large UHD monitor, that they would like to use as if it were multiple monitors, then this is the solution.
If anyone is still interested, and have a single very large UHD monitor, that they would like to use as if it were multiple monitors, then this is the solution.
Yes, that looks like a good quality monitor and I have a Samsung 305T myself and can vouch for their reliability as a brand.
Bit pricey though for what it is and personally I feel that 1440 pixels down the screen is as much as I'd like and will most likely be going for the Philips 40" monitor linked above. 2160p. Yum.
Boo
the problem with 40" monitor is that its ... too big. You would have to keep it further away from eyes to glance at whole screen at once, and that kills the purpose Being ultra wide doesn't tire your eyes. but then its personal preference anyway so have a go and you should be pleased anyway
Yes, that looks like a good quality monitor and I have a Samsung 305T myself and can vouch for their reliability as a brand.
Bit pricey though for what it is and personally I feel that 1440 pixels down the screen is as much as I'd like and will most likely be going for the Philips 40" monitor linked above. 2160p. Yum.
The barebones i5 system I bought recently with only Intel motherboard graphics will support 4K, but I think you only get 30Hz with it being HDMI 1, and the same is true of my 2 year old Dell laptop.
With these 4k monitors, do you have a multi-output graphics card, or just one output. Presumably the card needs to be pretty beefy?
I'll be looking for a new desktop soon and one of these monitors, while completely over the top for my needs, would appear to be just what I need.
I'm using a GeForce GT 770, using that to drive the 4k monitor and a 21inch monitor. I have a second card a GeForce GT 730 for my other monitors but I've stopped using it now until I figure out why it's interfering with my wifi connection.
You could probably get away with something less powerful though the 770 is pretty old now.
I'm after a new monitor for working from home, got to be at least 24", is 4k worth it resolution wise (as I spend most of my time working in IntelliJ on my Mac), or will 1080p do just as well?, less that 400 notes would be ideal, any recommendations?
I've got pretty much the same setup as this geezer (40 inch 4k +), he has done a write up.
Leave a comment: