Originally posted by Cyber Controller
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Conclusive Proof
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Conclusive Proof"
Collapse
-
It's your own fault
If you'd started from India or China you could have got the manufacturing done cheap, but no you had to start out in Britain, no chance, too expensive to manufacture here.
-
We were only in control of Earth for a short period and had only upgraded a few of you humans using Cybersuits we brought with us from our world (which were therefore infected by voidstuff). Unfortunately we hadn't had time to manufacture any Cybergear locally.
Bummer.
Leave a comment:
-
Quick question, I missed most of it but it seemed to me that the cybermen were building new cybermen on earth. If so these would not have been through the Void and so would not have been sucked back in. Plot hole or did I miss somthing relavent?
Leave a comment:
-
And a second rank one at that.Originally posted by Dundeegeorgebastard.
Put down by a Dalek. Oh, the ignomony, oh the grief, oh the humanity.....
Leave a comment:
-
You metal-plated
bastard.
Put down by a Dalek. Oh, the ignomony, oh the grief, oh the humanity.....
Leave a comment:
-
So is it just me
or does anybody else think that Russell Davies is camping up Dr Who?
Something to do with his own disease encroaching on his writing.
Dr who claiming to love a human (especially one as chavvy as Billie Piper)?
I don't think so.
Whatever next, doillies on the Dalek's heads?
And the Xmas special with Catherine Tate? Am I bothered? I don't think so.
Leave a comment:
-
It would have turned out differently if I had been in charge.
Leave a comment:
-
BolloxsOriginally posted by DimPrawnI'd like to point out, the phrase "a shed load of" does not refer to a shed as in a garden shed, but to the phrase "to shed a load" as in "the lorry has shed its load".
So to summarise, a shed load of daleks, would infact mean a they are off the back of a lorry. Know what I mean mate?

Leave a comment:
-
The CUK bulletin board is really 'The Void' us lot were unknowingly sucked into.
ps: Well those of us unfortunate enough to be covered in the kind of radio-active scum prevalent in workplaces selected by agents and infested with HR daleks.Last edited by BobTheCrate; 10 July 2006, 09:59.
Leave a comment:
-
Mate, you're living in fairy land, never mind a void dimension.Originally posted by Cyber ControllerYou're not singing anymore from your void dimension. At least our non-parallel universe Cyberbrethren are still going strong. Daleks? Pussies, more like.
Leave a comment:
-
You're not singing anymore from your void dimension. At least our non-parallel universe Cyberbrethren are still going strong. Daleks? Pussies, more like.Originally posted by A shed load of DaleksCybermen are a bunch of wussies and no match for us Daleks
Leave a comment:
-
A road block?Originally posted by wendigo100So what do you call sheds full of daleks that fall off the back of a lorry?
Leave a comment:
-
So what do you call sheds full of daleks that fall off the back of a lorry?
Leave a comment:
-
I'd like to point out, the phrase "a shed load of" does not refer to a shed as in a garden shed, but to the phrase "to shed a load" as in "the lorry has shed its load".
So to summarise, a shed load of daleks, would infact mean a they are off the back of a lorry. Know what I mean mate?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Today 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17

Leave a comment: