This craic chap ...

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

HeliCraig replied

8 August 2011, 15:14
Surely Craic isn't real? He must be a sockie for someone to start arguments with?

No-one is that much of a bed wetter in real life, surely?
Leave a comment:
xoggoth replied

8 August 2011, 15:04
I think poor old ATw must have sustained a head injury. Alway one of CUK's most sensible sorts but this week he's an idiot.
Leave a comment:
eek replied

8 August 2011, 14:31
Originally posted by AtW View Post

Ah sorry didn't see that. Will respond as soon as I can

xoggoth you've now got ATW lining up to spurt his own form of tulip. Was that really necessary?
Leave a comment:
AtW replied

8 August 2011, 14:17
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

Good move SAS. Much easier to do another stupid post attacking craic for no obvious reason than defend your implications on the outsourcing thread that:

a) All business decisions should be made on narrow criteria on a case by case basis despite the obvious lessons from China and
b) The Industrial Revolution in Britain was of no real consequence.

Ah sorry didn't see that. Will respond as soon as I can
Leave a comment:
sasguru replied

8 August 2011, 14:16
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post

Good move SAS. Much easier to do another stupid post attacking craic for no obvious reason than defend your implications on the outsourcing thread that:

a) All business decisions should be made on narrow criteria on a case by case basis despite the obvious lessons from China and
b) The Industrial Revolution in Britain was of no real consequence.

Ah sorry didn't see that. Will respond as soon as I can
Leave a comment:
xoggoth replied

8 August 2011, 14:10
Good move SAS. Much easier to do another stupid post attacking craic for no obvious reason than defend your implications on the outsourcing thread that:

a) All business decisions should be made on narrow criteria on a case by case basis despite the obvious lessons from China and
b) The Industrial Revolution in Britain was of no real consequence.

Last edited by xoggoth; 8 August 2011, 14:14.
Leave a comment:
shaunbhoy replied

8 August 2011, 14:09
Originally posted by sasguru View Post

... should be called non-craic or anti-craic. As he's as unlike a craic (which involves laughter, fun and good times) as its possible to be.
Maybe he should just be called bore.

Unlikely as it may seem...............WSS
Leave a comment:
sasguru started a topic This craic chap ...

8 August 2011, 14:00
This craic chap ...

... should be called non-craic or anti-craic. As he's as unlike a craic (which involves laughter, fun and good times) as its possible to be.
Maybe he should just be called bore.
Tags: None