Originally posted by cojak
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Realityhack should not be a moderator.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Realityhack should not be a moderator."
Collapse
-
-
3 days at the moment. But final decision rests with Administrator. Moving thread to LR.
Leave a comment:
-
That's livened the thread up a bit, temp ban or permanent for the Markmm sockie?
Leave a comment:
-
36 pages now. I can't be bothered to wade through the previous pages so I'll just make this point.
The moderators and administrator do talk to each other and all action is collective. There are no "loose cannons".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostDon't tell me craig1 is yet another kandr sockie. Dear God, will it never end?
Trolls are a boil on the backside of the internet. Lance them and IP address ban them.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craig1
I may be new to this forum but 35 pages of biting and reacting to a troll's trolling is surely a new record for an internet forum
OK, let's be optimistic and assume not ..
You obviously haven't seen James Harris at work on the usenet sci.math group. Now there's a world-class troll.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craig1 View PostNah, it's cold out there and I've just got myself a brew.
hold me back, hold me back
just dont get me started, knowwarramean
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by markmm View PostThe burden of proof is with you, you cannot prove it
Originally posted by markmm View Postso I suggest you drop it. Do you understand what I am saying?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craig1 View PostI may be new to this forum but 35 pages of biting and reacting to a troll's trolling is surely a new record for an internet forum...
outside . now
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by craig1 View PostI may be new to this forum but 35 pages of biting and reacting to a troll's trolling is surely a new record for an internet forum...
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: