• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Can we just ban Gricer, please?"

Collapse

  • chef
    replied
    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
    Hehe. You said 'intercourse'.


    glad to have you back Xen

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    OK. Ban anyone who links to newspapers with only fugly pictures.

    Leave a comment:


  • xoggoth
    replied
    No legs worth looking at in the Guardian though cos Lefties are all ugly. If they had a page 3 it would probably have a picture of Bob Crow. Coor!

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Not wishing to sound like a broken record, but isn't this a thread started specifically to "diss" another poster?

    Or do we make an exception in this case
    Hmm. Has this happened before? But it is borderline. Is it abuse or fair comment?

    Originally posted by doodab View Post
    If you ban links to the Daily Mail I will no longer be able to follow them and hence will no longer have the opportunity be distracted by Kelly Brook's legs.

    I would hate to have to know the URL for the Daily Mail so I could type it in myself.
    I can't argue with that logic. I guess I'll just have to put up with them.

    Leave a comment:


  • doodab
    replied
    If you ban links to the Daily Mail I will no longer be able to follow them and hence will no longer have the opportunity be distracted by Kelly Brook's legs.

    I would hate to have to know the URL for the Daily Mail so I could type it in myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    I'm not dissing him. I'm stating that's he's a complete fuqwit bore.
    HTH
    I slouch corrected. Thanks Sas.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Not wishing to sound like a broken record, but isn't this a thread started specifically to "diss" another poster?

    Or do we make an exception in this case
    I'm not dissing him. I'm stating that's he's a complete fuqwit bore.
    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by suityou01 View Post
    Not wishing to sound like a broken record, but isn't this a thread started specifically to "diss" another poster?

    Or do we make an exception in this case
    It doesn't work like that. You are allowed to diss people who are below in the reputation standings. You are not allowed to diss those above you.

    So in your case, you are allowed to diss..... errrr. Gricerboy, Wodewick, Supergal & Churchill.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/membe...putation&pp=30

    Leave a comment:


  • MarillionFan
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    If his puppet master would make him do something bannable, I'd be happy to oblige. The guy dissed Dr Who, for crying out loud!

    While we're at it, can we ban anyone who links to the Daily Mail?
    Can we ban people who post multiple links to other websites?

    Leave a comment:


  • suityou01
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    If his puppet master would make him do something bannable, I'd be happy to oblige. The guy dissed Dr Who, for crying out loud!

    While we're at it, can we ban anyone who links to the Daily Mail?
    Not wishing to sound like a broken record, but isn't this a thread started specifically to "diss" another poster?

    Or do we make an exception in this case

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    If his puppet master would make him do something bannable, I'd be happy to oblige. The guy dissed Dr Who, for crying out loud!

    While we're at it, can we ban anyone who links to the Daily Mail?
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 15 September 2010, 11:51. Reason: Does anyone else see two "dissed" in this post? They're not there when I edit it... there's only one.

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    I'm with SAS on this - someone please ban him.

    Leave a comment:


  • fullyautomatix
    replied
    I quite agree with SAS. The pollution is unbearable.

    Leave a comment:


  • gricerboy
    replied
    Originally posted by gricerboy View Post
    Since all intercourse between him and myself has involved a unidirectional hail of invective I have long sinced reached the conclusion that this individual is obfuscating some deep character flaws by unleashing this torrent of abuse on an innocent poster.
    And just to add a bit of bidirectionality to the proceedings, I'd like to add that my own view on Sasguru is that he is a complete and utter vulgarian. So there.

    Leave a comment:


  • SupremeSpod
    replied
    Originally posted by Boudica View Post
    wow! i just read a whole post of gricers - i was only three lines long - and i'm still awake
    Beware, the arms of Morpheus await.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X