Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
If you ban links to the Daily Mail I will no longer be able to follow them and hence will no longer have the opportunity be distracted by Kelly Brook's legs.
I would hate to have to know the URL for the Daily Mail so I could type it in myself.
I can't argue with that logic. I guess I'll just have to put up with them.
If you ban links to the Daily Mail I will no longer be able to follow them and hence will no longer have the opportunity be distracted by Kelly Brook's legs.
I would hate to have to know the URL for the Daily Mail so I could type it in myself.
If his puppet master would make him do something bannable, I'd be happy to oblige. The guy dissed Dr Who, for crying out loud!
While we're at it, can we ban anyone who links to the Daily Mail?
Last edited by NotAllThere; 15 September 2010, 11:51.
Reason: Does anyone else see two "dissed" in this post? They're not there when I edit it... there's only one.
Since all intercourse between him and myself has involved a unidirectional hail of invective I have long sinced reached the conclusion that this individual is obfuscating some deep character flaws by unleashing this torrent of abuse on an innocent poster.
And just to add a bit of bidirectionality to the proceedings, I'd like to add that my own view on Sasguru is that he is a complete and utter vulgarian. So there.
Leave a comment: