Word Associations is more educational than 90% of the drivvle that is spewed in General.
Learnt about the Borgias this week, and a couple of other things I wiki'd after seeing something in the Word Association thread.
Leave it where it is.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Petition to move Word Associations
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Petition to move Word Associations"
Collapse
-
First they came for the drivellers, but I said nothing, for I was not a driveller.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostThe problem with 'we've always done it this way' is complacency. There is nothing wrong with challenging the status quo IMO.
Leave a comment:
-
WHS.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostCome on. It's light relief really isn't it.
Ditto for "Currently Listening To........." and "Currently drinking ..."
If "One-A-Day", "Please put more jokes here", "List your invented "fake facts"" belong in L-R (which of course they do), so does "Word Associations".
And, while you're at it, remove the sticky from "test please delete". Leaving a closed thread at the top of the forum is silly, and cruel since the last one to post on there was popular with the members and banned.
For weeks there's been talk of "changes are coming".
and
Leave a comment:
-
User. One. Singular. Don't let the facts get in the way Admin.
Expressing my opinion. Poll was supposed to see if others felt the same way.
The problem with 'we've always done it this way' is complacency. There is nothing wrong with challenging the status quo IMO.
But as you don't want anyone to do it. I'll not raise the subject again.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Standard trolling techniques there, MF. Of course you got busted
- Identify some long-standing aspect of the forum that is widely accepted by the community;
- Attack it, claiming to offer reasoned arguments as to why it should be condemned;
- Hope that steps 1 and 2 provoke an argument.
Marks out of ten:
- Innovative trolling technique: -10
- Amusing trolling technique: -10
- Concealment of trolling intent: -10
Overall assessment of attempted trolling: epic fail
Leave a comment:
-
It is an open forum but it is also a forum that I have run on this system for the past 5 years and also worked on the EZBoard version too so I am not sure about the thread being in line with the way it has always been run.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostNo, it was a legit post, as in lines with the way the forum is run, on an open forum, in the way it's always been run IMO!
You have been fairly sporadic in your attendance here I will admit, but you were posting in 2006, when the thread was started, so why wait 4 years to complain about it if not to simply wind up other forum members?
You complained on the one a day thread about porn being posted on there and have driven other users away with the full-on onslaught of your posting style. This is not the MarillionFan show, it is a forum for all its members and you would do well to remember that.
Leave a comment:
-
and BTW. I have been a member of this board longer than all highlighted!Originally posted by administrator View PostWas the purpose of this thread to wind up long-standing members of the forum or to call into question the people who run the forum? Either does not impress me. If you want to wind people up then stop it. If you want to question whether a thread should be in General or elsewhere then mail me about it, it is not open for public debate.
Leave a comment:
-
No, it was a legit post, as in lines with the way the forum is run, on an open forum, in the way it's always been run IMO!Originally posted by administrator View PostWas the purpose of this thread to wind up long-standing members of the forum or to call into question the people who run the forum? Either does not impress me. If you want to wind people up then stop it. If you want to question whether a thread should be in General or elsewhere then mail me about it, it is not open for public debate.
Leave a comment:
-
Was the purpose of this thread to wind up long-standing members of the forum or to call into question the people who run the forum? Either does not impress me. If you want to wind people up then stop it. If you want to question whether a thread should be in General or elsewhere then mail me about it, it is not open for public debate.
Leave a comment:
-
and there is the answer.
It's ok to post fukking drivel all over General. Another fantastic piece of moderation.
Leave a comment:
-
NF. You cheeky git.
This is not a troll for trolls sake. This WA thread gives the impression that said posters have something to say! Bit like the TPD thread.
The idea of a post count on a forum, gives an indication of post count and therefore can infer quality. I gave Toolpusher a little gentle knock because he had 6000 odd posts. Little did I know that 5500 came from one thread. TP chastised me for assuming he was a quality poster as he said that LR posts didnt count.
Others are the same. 10000+ posts, mostly drivel word games. Gives the impression of something to say.
Not after a reaction. I reckon, that the majority(not the 10 or so on the list of course) will say move it to LR!
Let's see tomorrow. The vote will start -10!!!Last edited by MarillionFan; 8 April 2010, 07:02.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes. But that was a joke. This is serious.Originally posted by The Wikir Man View PostI believe that one of the moderators tried that recently.
It was a moment of comic genius, it must be said.


The following have given the impression that they have something interesting to say on the forums. Move it to LR IMO and right a wrong!
editted, so as not to appear trollishLast edited by MarillionFan; 8 April 2010, 07:02.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Leave a comment: