Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Contract Screening
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contract Screening"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by jammer View PostGiven the scenario where I pay for QDOS and they come back saying it's Inside IR35. What would then be the best way forward given the QDOS delays?
I'm sure someone will says it doesn't matter, risk is with the client but I don't think it's smart to start a gig knowing the SDS is incorrect.
Leave a comment:
-
Given the scenario where I pay for QDOS and they come back saying it's Inside IR35. What would then be the best way forward given the QDOS delays?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWhy would you not?
It doesn't (usually) cost anything and if you are being rushed to start say Monday that would be a bigger red flag
I will still be getting my contracts checked with QDOS. No brainer for me. Something is going to change in the future so why not cover your ass if it costs (next to) nothing.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostWhy would you not?
It doesn't (usually) cost anything and if you are being rushed to start say Monday that would be a bigger red flag
Please note that our faster turnaround services are temporarily suspended until further notice due to high volumes. We are working hard to resume this service as soon as possible. The current turnaround time is 2 weeks. Please accept our sincerest apologies for any inconvenience caused.Last edited by eek; 6 March 2020, 12:39.
Leave a comment:
-
Why would you not?
It doesn't (usually) cost anything and if you are being rushed to start say Monday that would be a bigger red flag
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eek View PostIt's outside
So you aren't responsible especially as you haven't filled in any questionnaire related to the determination.
Provided you've got the determination in writing from the company and the agency I think you are good to go.
Appreciate the reply chap.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jammer View PostHey Guys,
What are peoples thoughts on getting contracts checked for IR35 compliance? Obviously it's a good idea and should be done (I do) but I've got an interview today with a company and they have already determined it's outside IR35.
The reason for this post is that due to the type of company it is I would be absolutely floored and amazed if they had gotten this determination wrong.
My gut is telling me to get it vetted anyway but the potential speed they would want my bum on one of their seats might mean getting the vetting response after I need/have to start.
Cheers all,
J
So you aren't responsible especially as you haven't filled in any questionnaire related to the determination.
Provided you've got the determination in writing from the company and the agency I think you are good to go.
Leave a comment:
-
Contract Screening
Hey Guys,
What are peoples thoughts on getting contracts checked for IR35 compliance? Obviously it's a good idea and should be done (I do) but I've got an interview today with a company and they have already determined it's outside IR35.
The reason for this post is that due to the type of company it is I would be absolutely floored and amazed if they had gotten this determination wrong.
My gut is telling me to get it vetted anyway but the potential speed they would want my bum on one of their seats might mean getting the vetting response after I need/have to start.
Cheers all,
JTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The JSL nub for umbrellas/agencies: who runs PAYE and who will HMRC bill? Today 18:16
- How HMRC’s umbrella company JSL rules will play out Aug 13 23:33
- As Small Business Commissioner, I invite unpaid limited company contractors to come forward Aug 13 17:50
- Is Labour just going to leave limited company contracting zombie-like, neither dead nor alive? Aug 12 22:56
- Contracting Awards 2025 unveils ‘stellar’ shortlist Aug 11 21:31
- If it’s JSL liability, it’s Managed Service Providers (MSPs) too, potentially Aug 8 02:54
- Labour's new anti-late payment package ‘a contractor confidence boost’ Aug 7 00:33
- MSC test cases: Feb 2026 spells certainty for Boox/CK contractors Aug 6 05:36
- Under JSL, agencies are ‘umbrella companies’ if no brollies are present Aug 4 23:06
- How to get paid by a closed (or closing) recruitment agency Aug 4 17:37
Leave a comment: