Well, it is interesting that the legality has been brought into question
			
		
	- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Legal opinion on mess of wrongly declared inside"
					Collapse
				
			- 
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
 To be honest its not. Every 5th post has been questioning something and calling it illegal because we don't like it. Even if someone did find something that might be arguable no one is going to take it further anyway.
 
- 
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
 Well, it is interesting that the legality has been brought into question but the route to claim back taxes based on an incorrect Inside determination looks even worse now than it might have before.
 
 The thing is, since in times past whereby the HMRC had to review both the contract AND the past working practices to ensure words married up to practices when determining an Inside or Outside decision, with the client having to predetermine without any practices to later review, the retrospective claw back route is needed.
 
 One hopes.
 Leave a comment:
- 
	
		
		
			
			
			
		
		
		
		
	
	
	
	
 Legal opinion on mess of wrongly declared inside...because it's news, not that it will matter...
 
 Extension Of UK's IR35 To The Private Sector - Part 16Tags: None
 
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


 
				 
				 
				 
				
Leave a comment: