Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "when is a public company not a public company Private/Public parnerships"
EU government orgs aren't subject to the FOI act, they're subject to an EC regulation which is the counterpart of the FOI act and which does essentially the same thing.
Why is that so difficult to understand?
It may well be a counterpart, but is completely unrelated and irrelevant for the purposes of this legislation.
EU government orgs aren't subject to the FOI act, they're subject to an EC regulation which is the counterpart of the FOI act and which does essentially the same thing.
Exactly....I don't know why people are still struggling with this. It's all in black-and-white in the amended ITEPA (for the Finance Act 2017) and the corresponding FOI Act references. There's a lot of ambiguity in the revised legislation, but I really can't see any ambiguity about the definition of PS. It's also worth noting that PS bodies with specific exclusions under the FOI are still PS organisations for the purposes of the revised IR35 legislation. A PS organisation needs to be outside of the scope of the Act to be not a PS organisation for the purposes of the new IR35 legislation.
EU government orgs aren't subject to the FOI act, they're subject to an EC regulation which is the counterpart of the FOI act and which does essentially the same thing.
Why is this so difficult? The definition of "Public Sector" for the purposes of the amended ITEPA is the FOI Act 2000 and the FOI (Scotland) Act 2002 (see 61L, Meaning of "public authority"). It isn't organisations that are "Public Sector" by some other definition. It isn't organisations that are subject to something "like the FOI Act 2000". It isn't PS organisations that are not subject to the FOI Act 2000. It is precisely the organisations listed in the FOI Act 2000 or the FOI (Scotland) Act 2002, nothing more, nothing less.
So in your sweeping statement you're saying the EC reg they're subject to is 100% the same thing as FOI and therefore applies?
Why is this so difficult? The definition of "Public Sector" for the purposes of the amended ITEPA is the FOI Act 2000 and the FOI (Scotland) Act 2002 (see 61L, Meaning of "public authority"). It isn't organisations that are "Public Sector" by some other definition. It isn't organisations that are subject to something "like the FOI Act 2000". It isn't PS organisations that are not subject to the FOI Act 2000. It is precisely the organisations listed in the FOI Act 2000 or the FOI (Scotland) Act 2002, nothing more, nothing less.
Several state bodies seem to exist as public/private partnerships with HM government for example only owning 49% of the shares, for the new Public Sector IR 35 rules, were do such beasts fit in to the grand scale of doing things?
If they are subject to FOI Act, they are in scope.
Leave a comment: