Seems Barrowman probably has "spies watching this or the wiki page" all the time looking for damaging postings etc.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "AML found wiki page had controversial listing"
Collapse
-
-
It wasn't myself who added it but it is tempting to put it back up now its been removed. I've just been looking at the AML company group online since my unfortunate situation arose with them and the HMRC and found the Wiki page. Seems Barrowman probably has "spies watching this or the wiki page" all the time looking for damaging postings etc.
I see he is trying to white wash his image with setup of a charity foundation in his name. https://barrowmanfoundation.com/news/ how kind of him
Ps you cant find anyone on Linkedin or online anywhere that has worked for AML limited these people don't exist now or historically anywhere. Its been totally removed, sanitised, whitewashed and id wager its been done professionally for damage limitation reasons for Barrowman's image etc. I was looking at my old AML email with the senior tax advisors reply back wheat he HMRC sent letter sentt saying that i was involved in aggressive tax evasion scheme.
Hi *************
The letter and information required from HMRC is quite intimidating and in the normal business world we would never phrase letters as such. This is an informal check into your return, which, unfortunately asks for an excessive amount of information. We will be discussing our response with HMRC over the coming weeks to decipher whether it is beneficial to respond on an individual or collective basis.
Please can I ask that you read the attached newsletter from AML, regarding these 2012-13 self assessment checks; note that AML will respond to this letter on your behalf and that the response deadline has been temporarily removed by HMRC until further notice.
Kind regards,
************** l Tax Senior
AML Tax (IOM) Ltd
Knox House 16-18 Finch Road Douglas IM1 2PT
T. 01624 616567 F. 01624 616561
www.amltax.co.uk
Description: Description: cid:[email protected]
Important information
Following our newsletter of 14 November we would like to inform you that, following discussions between AML and HMRC, the response deadlines have been temporarily removed by HMRC until further notice.
AML wish to take this opportunity to thank you for your co-operation and to remind you that no further action is required on your part, unless and until you are contacted again by us.
We will keep you informed of any revised deadlines, and the efforts that AML will undertake to ensure that they are met, as soon as the information becomes available.
Yours
AML Tax (IOM) Limited
Originally posted by NotAllThere View PostIt's been removed as unsourced and potentially libellous.
Wikipedia have fairly clear rules about information concerning living people. You could try and add it back in, but the chances are whoever removed it will simply escalate and the page will become protected against edits.
There's nothing to stop you recovering it and providing sources, in accordance with wikipedia rules.Last edited by DOT COM; 26 May 2018, 11:43.
Leave a comment:
-
It's been removed as unsourced and potentially libellous.
Wikipedia have fairly clear rules about information concerning living people. You could try and add it back in, but the chances are whoever removed it will simply escalate and the page will become protected against edits.
There's nothing to stop you recovering it and providing sources, in accordance with wikipedia rules.
Leave a comment:
-
AML found wiki page had controversial listing
About time it was mentioned somewhere !!
Controversy[edit]
<mod snip>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_BarrowmanTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractors, don’t be fooled by HMRC Spotlight 67 on MSCs Today 09:20
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Yesterday 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Dec 2 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
Leave a comment: